From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pf0-f197.google.com (mail-pf0-f197.google.com [209.85.192.197]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EB0D6B02CC for ; Mon, 9 Jul 2018 08:56:10 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-pf0-f197.google.com with SMTP id w11-v6so5641377pfk.14 for ; Mon, 09 Jul 2018 05:56:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from www262.sakura.ne.jp (www262.sakura.ne.jp. [202.181.97.72]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id r11-v6si13631107pgs.274.2018.07.09.05.56.08 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 09 Jul 2018 05:56:09 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: BUG: corrupted list in cpu_stop_queue_work References: <00000000000032412205706753b5@google.com> <000000000000693c7d057087caf3@google.com> From: Tetsuo Handa Message-ID: <1271c58e-876b-0df3-3224-319d82634663@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2018 21:55:17 +0900 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <000000000000693c7d057087caf3@google.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Matthew Wilcox Cc: syzbot , bigeasy@linutronix.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, matt@codeblueprint.co.uk, mingo@kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org, syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com, tglx@linutronix.de, linux-mm Hello Matthew, It seems to me that there are other locations which do not check xas_store() failure. Is that really OK? If they are OK, I think we want a comment like /* This never fails. */ or /* Failure is OK because ... */ for each call without failure check.