From: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com>
To: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: "linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"akpm@linux-foundation.org" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"Wu, Fengguang" <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH]vmscan: handle underflow for get_scan_ratio
Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2010 14:32:36 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1269930756.17240.4.camel@sli10-desk.sh.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100330150453.8E9F.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1277 bytes --]
On Tue, 2010-03-30 at 14:08 +0800, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
> Hi
>
> > Commit 84b18490d1f1bc7ed5095c929f78bc002eb70f26 introduces a regression.
> > With it, our tmpfs test always oom. The test has a lot of rotated anon
> > pages and cause percent[0] zero. Actually the percent[0] is a very small
> > value, but our calculation round it to zero. The commit makes vmscan
> > completely skip anon pages and cause oops.
> > An option is if percent[x] is zero in get_scan_ratio(), forces it
> > to 1. See below patch.
> > But the offending commit still changes behavior. Without the commit, we scan
> > all pages if priority is zero, below patch doesn't fix this. Don't know if
> > It's required to fix this too.
>
> Can you please post your /proc/meminfo
attached.
> and reproduce program? I'll digg it.
our test is quite sample. mount tmpfs with double memory size and store several
copies (memory size * 2/G) of kernel in tmpfs, and then do kernel build.
for example, there is 3G memory and then tmpfs size is 6G and there is 6
kernel copy.
> Very unfortunately, this patch isn't acceptable. In past time, vmscan
> had similar logic, but 1% swap-out made lots bug reports.
can you elaborate this?
Completely restore previous behavior (do full scan with priority 0) is
ok too.
[-- Attachment #2: meminfo --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 1114 bytes --]
MemTotal: 3078372 kB
MemFree: 34612 kB
Buffers: 960 kB
Cached: 2577644 kB
SwapCached: 24580 kB
Active: 2125712 kB
Inactive: 541972 kB
Active(anon): 2120276 kB
Inactive(anon): 534696 kB
Active(file): 5436 kB
Inactive(file): 7276 kB
Unevictable: 0 kB
Mlocked: 0 kB
SwapTotal: 6297472 kB
SwapFree: 6184988 kB
Dirty: 1720 kB
Writeback: 24024 kB
AnonPages: 64888 kB
Mapped: 3996 kB
Shmem: 2566004 kB
Slab: 290416 kB
SReclaimable: 113840 kB
SUnreclaim: 176576 kB
KernelStack: 3072 kB
PageTables: 6832 kB
NFS_Unstable: 0 kB
Bounce: 0 kB
WritebackTmp: 0 kB
CommitLimit: 7836656 kB
Committed_AS: 2811564 kB
VmallocTotal: 34359738367 kB
VmallocUsed: 289724 kB
VmallocChunk: 34359444080 kB
HugePages_Total: 0
HugePages_Free: 0
HugePages_Rsvd: 0
HugePages_Surp: 0
Hugepagesize: 2048 kB
DirectMap4k: 10240 kB
DirectMap2M: 3127296 kB
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-03-30 6:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-03-30 5:53 Shaohua Li
2010-03-30 6:08 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-03-30 6:32 ` Shaohua Li [this message]
2010-03-30 6:40 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-03-30 6:53 ` Shaohua Li
2010-03-30 7:31 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-03-30 8:13 ` Shaohua Li
2010-03-31 4:53 ` Shaohua Li
2010-03-31 5:38 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-03-31 5:51 ` Wu Fengguang
2010-03-31 6:00 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-03-31 6:03 ` Wu Fengguang
2010-04-01 22:16 ` Andrew Morton
2010-04-02 9:13 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-04-06 1:22 ` Wu Fengguang
2010-04-06 3:36 ` Rik van Riel
2010-03-31 5:53 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-04-02 6:50 ` Shaohua Li
2010-04-02 9:14 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-04-02 9:24 ` Shaohua Li
2010-04-04 14:19 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-04-06 1:25 ` Shaohua Li
2010-04-06 1:36 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-04-06 1:50 ` Wu Fengguang
2010-04-06 2:06 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-04-06 2:30 ` Wu Fengguang
2010-04-06 2:58 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-04-06 3:31 ` Wu Fengguang
2010-04-06 3:40 ` Rik van Riel
2010-04-06 4:49 ` Wu Fengguang
2010-04-06 5:09 ` Shaohua Li
2010-04-04 0:48 ` Wu Fengguang
2010-04-06 1:27 ` Shaohua Li
2010-04-06 5:03 ` Wu Fengguang
2010-04-06 5:36 ` Shaohua Li
2010-04-09 6:51 ` Shaohua Li
2010-04-09 21:20 ` Andrew Morton
2010-04-09 21:25 ` Rik van Riel
2010-04-13 1:30 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-04-13 2:42 ` Rik van Riel
2010-04-13 7:55 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-04-13 8:55 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-04-14 1:27 ` Shaohua Li
2010-04-15 3:25 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-04-12 1:57 ` Shaohua Li
2010-03-31 5:41 ` Wu Fengguang
2010-03-30 10:17 ` Minchan Kim
2010-03-30 10:25 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-03-30 11:56 ` Balbir Singh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1269930756.17240.4.camel@sli10-desk.sh.intel.com \
--to=shaohua.li@intel.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
--cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox