linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>
To: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
	Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>,
	Adam Litke <agl@us.ibm.com>, Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/12] Export fragmentation index via /proc/pagetypeinfo
Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2010 00:37:57 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1266507477.1709.225.camel@barrios-desktop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1265976059-7459-5-git-send-email-mel@csn.ul.ie>

On Fri, 2010-02-12 at 12:00 +0000, Mel Gorman wrote:
> Fragmentation index is a value that makes sense when an allocation of a
> given size would fail. The index indicates whether an allocation failure is
> due to a lack of memory (values towards 0) or due to external fragmentation
> (value towards 1).  For the most part, the huge page size will be the size
> of interest but not necessarily so it is exported on a per-order and per-zone
> basis via /proc/pagetypeinfo.
> 
> The index is normally calculated as a value between 0 and 1 which is
> obviously unsuitable within the kernel. Instead, the first three decimal
> places are used as a value between 0 and 1000 for an integer approximation.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>
Reviewed-by: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>

> ---
>  Documentation/filesystems/proc.txt |   11 ++++++
>  mm/vmstat.c                        |   63 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 74 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/filesystems/proc.txt b/Documentation/filesystems/proc.txt
> index 0968a81..06bf53c 100644
> --- a/Documentation/filesystems/proc.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/filesystems/proc.txt
> @@ -618,6 +618,10 @@ Unusable free space index at order
>  Node    0, zone      DMA                         0      0      0      2      6     18     34     67     99    227    485
>  Node    0, zone    DMA32                         0      0      1      2      4      7     10     17     23     31     34
>  
> +Fragmentation index at order
> +Node    0, zone      DMA                        -1     -1     -1     -1     -1     -1     -1     -1     -1     -1     -1
> +Node    0, zone    DMA32                        -1     -1     -1     -1     -1     -1     -1     -1     -1     -1     -1
> +
>  Number of blocks type     Unmovable  Reclaimable      Movable      Reserve      Isolate
>  Node 0, zone      DMA            2            0            5            1            0
>  Node 0, zone    DMA32           41            6          967            2            0
> @@ -639,6 +643,13 @@ value between 0 and 1000. The higher the value, the more of free memory is
>  unusable and by implication, the worse the external fragmentation is. The
>  percentage of unusable free memory can be found by dividing this value by 10.
>  
> +The fragmentation index, is only meaningful if an allocation would fail and
> +indicates what the failure is due to. A value of -1 such as in the example
> +states that the allocation would succeed. If it would fail, the value is
> +between 0 and 1000. A value tending towards 0 implies the allocation failed
> +due to a lack of memory. A value tending towards 1000 implies it failed
> +due to external fragmentation.
> +
>  If min_free_kbytes has been tuned correctly (recommendations made by hugeadm
>  from libhugetlbfs http://sourceforge.net/projects/libhugetlbfs/), one can
>  make an estimate of the likely number of huge pages that can be allocated
> diff --git a/mm/vmstat.c b/mm/vmstat.c
> index d05d610..e2d0cc1 100644
> --- a/mm/vmstat.c
> +++ b/mm/vmstat.c
> @@ -494,6 +494,35 @@ static void fill_contig_page_info(struct zone *zone,
>  }
>  
>  /*
> + * A fragmentation index only makes sense if an allocation of a requested
> + * size would fail. If that is true, the fragmentation index indicates
> + * whether external fragmentation or a lack of memory was the problem.
> + * The value can be used to determine if page reclaim or compaction
> + * should be used
> + */
> +int fragmentation_index(struct zone *zone,

Like previous [3/12], why do you remain "zone" argument?
If you will use it in future, I don't care. It's just trivial. 

-- 
Kind regards,
Minchan Kim


--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2010-02-18 15:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-02-12 12:00 [PATCH 0/12] Memory Compaction v2r12 Mel Gorman
2010-02-12 12:00 ` [PATCH 01/12] mm: Document /proc/pagetypeinfo Mel Gorman
2010-02-12 15:54   ` Christoph Lameter
2010-02-16  7:05   ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-02-12 12:00 ` [PATCH 02/12] Allow CONFIG_MIGRATION to be set without CONFIG_NUMA or memory hot-remove Mel Gorman
2010-02-16 17:43   ` Rik van Riel
2010-02-12 12:00 ` [PATCH 03/12] Export unusable free space index via /proc/pagetypeinfo Mel Gorman
2010-02-16  7:03   ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-02-16  8:36     ` Mel Gorman
2010-02-16  8:41       ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-02-16  8:50         ` Mel Gorman
2010-02-16 18:28   ` Rik van Riel
2010-02-18 15:23   ` Minchan Kim
2010-02-18 15:32     ` Mel Gorman
2010-02-12 12:00 ` [PATCH 04/12] Export fragmentation " Mel Gorman
2010-02-16  7:59   ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-02-16  8:41     ` Mel Gorman
2010-02-16  8:49       ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-02-17  1:44   ` Rik van Riel
2010-02-18 15:37   ` Minchan Kim [this message]
2010-02-12 12:00 ` [PATCH 05/12] Memory compaction core Mel Gorman
2010-02-16  8:31   ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-02-16  8:48     ` Mel Gorman
2010-02-16 14:55       ` Christoph Lameter
2010-02-16 14:59         ` Mel Gorman
2010-02-18 19:37           ` Christoph Lameter
2010-02-18 21:35             ` Mel Gorman
2010-02-19  0:04             ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-02-17 13:29     ` Mel Gorman
2010-02-17 15:45       ` Rik van Riel
2010-02-18 16:58   ` Minchan Kim
2010-02-18 17:34     ` Mel Gorman
2010-02-19  1:21       ` Minchan Kim
2010-02-19 14:33         ` Mel Gorman
2010-02-12 12:00 ` [PATCH 06/12] Add /proc trigger for memory compaction Mel Gorman
2010-02-12 18:34   ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2010-02-12 18:38     ` Mel Gorman
2010-02-17 16:30   ` Rik van Riel
2010-02-18 19:51   ` Christoph Lameter
2010-02-19  1:56   ` Minchan Kim
2010-02-12 12:00 ` [PATCH 07/12] Add /sys trigger for per-node " Mel Gorman
2010-02-17 16:30   ` Rik van Riel
2010-02-12 12:00 ` [PATCH 08/12] Direct compact when a high-order allocation fails Mel Gorman
2010-02-18  3:57   ` Rik van Riel
2010-02-12 12:00 ` [PATCH 09/12] Do not compact within a preferred zone after a compaction failure Mel Gorman
2010-02-18  4:09   ` Rik van Riel
2010-02-12 12:00 ` [PATCH 10/12] mm: Check for an empty VMA list in rmap_walk_anon Mel Gorman
2010-02-17 18:22   ` Mel Gorman
2010-02-12 12:00 ` [PATCH 11/12] mm: Take the RCU read lock " Mel Gorman
2010-02-12 12:00 ` [PATCH 12/12] mm: Check the anon_vma is still valid in rmap_walk_anon() Mel Gorman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1266507477.1709.225.camel@barrios-desktop \
    --to=minchan.kim@gmail.com \
    --cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
    --cc=agl@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=avi@redhat.com \
    --cc=cl@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mel@csn.ul.ie \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox