From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>
Cc: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>,
Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/7] mmc: Don't use PF_MEMALLOC
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 11:54:56 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1258541696.3918.237.camel@laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <28c262360911180231o7fcd2128hc9c40f4fffa3f7d6@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, 2009-11-18 at 19:31 +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
> >
> > Sure some generic blocklevel infrastructure might work, _but_ you cannot
> > take away the responsibility of determining the amount of memory needed,
> > nor does any of this have any merit if you do not limit yourself to that
> > amount.
>
> Yes. Some one have to take a responsibility.
>
> The intention was we could take away the responsibility from block driver.
> Instead of driver, VM would take the responsibility.
>
> You mean althgouth VM could take the responsiblity, it is hard to
> expect amout of pages needed by block drivers?
Correct, its near impossible for the VM to accurately guess the amount
of memory needed for a driver, or limit the usage of the driver.
The driver could be very simple in that it'll just start a DMA on the
page and get an interrupt when done, not consuming much (if any) memory
beyond the generic BIO structure, but it could also be some iSCSI
monstrosity which involves the full network stack and userspace.
That is why I generally prefer the user of PF_MEMALLOC to take
responsibility, because it knows its own consumption and can limit its
own consumption.
Now, I don't think (but I could be wring here) that you need to bother
with PF_MEMALLOC unless you're swapping. File based pages should always
be able to free some memory due to the dirty-limit, whcih basically
guarantees that there are some clean file pages for every dirty file
page.
My swap-over-nfs series used to have a block-layer hook to expose the
swap-over-block behaviour:
http://programming.kicks-ass.net/kernel-patches/vm_deadlock/v12.99/blk_queue_swapdev.patch
That gives block devices the power to refuse being swapped over, which
could be an alternative to using PF_MEMALLOC.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-11-18 10:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-11-17 7:16 [PATCH 0/7] Kill PF_MEMALLOC abuse KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-11-17 7:17 ` [PATCH 1/7] dm: use __GFP_HIGH instead PF_MEMALLOC KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-11-17 13:15 ` Alasdair G Kergon
2009-11-18 6:17 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-11-17 7:17 ` [PATCH 2/7] mmc: Don't use PF_MEMALLOC KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-11-17 10:29 ` Alan Cox
2009-11-17 10:32 ` Minchan Kim
2009-11-17 10:38 ` Oliver Neukum
2009-11-17 11:58 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-11-17 12:51 ` Minchan Kim
2009-11-17 20:47 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-11-18 0:01 ` Minchan Kim
2009-11-18 9:56 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-11-18 10:31 ` Minchan Kim
2009-11-18 10:54 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2009-11-18 11:15 ` Minchan Kim
2009-11-17 7:18 ` [PATCH 3/7] mtd: " KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-11-17 7:19 ` [PATCH 4/7] nandsim: " KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-11-23 15:00 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2009-11-23 20:01 ` Adrian Hunter
2009-11-24 10:46 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-11-24 11:56 ` Adrian Hunter
2009-11-25 0:42 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-11-25 7:13 ` Adrian Hunter
2009-11-25 7:18 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-11-17 7:21 ` [PATCH 5/7] Revert "Intel IOMMU: Avoid memory allocation failures in dma map api calls" KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-11-17 7:22 ` [PATCH 6/7] cifs: Don't use PF_MEMALLOC KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-11-17 7:32 ` [PATCH] Mark cifs mailing list as "moderated as non-subscribers" KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-11-17 12:47 ` [PATCH 6/7] cifs: Don't use PF_MEMALLOC Jeff Layton
2009-11-17 16:40 ` Steve French
2009-11-18 6:31 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-11-17 7:23 ` [PATCH 7/7] xfs: " KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-11-17 22:11 ` Dave Chinner
2009-11-18 8:56 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-11-18 22:16 ` Dave Chinner
2009-11-17 8:07 ` [PATCH 0/7] Kill PF_MEMALLOC abuse David Rientjes
2009-11-17 8:33 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-11-17 8:36 ` David Rientjes
2009-11-17 20:56 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-11-18 5:55 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-11-17 10:15 ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-11-17 10:24 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-11-17 10:27 ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-11-17 12:24 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-11-17 12:47 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1258541696.3918.237.camel@laptop \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=minchan.kim@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox