From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Hugh Dickins <hugh.dickins@tiscali.co.uk>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Izik Eidus <ieidus@redhat.com>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] mm: stop ptlock enlarging struct page
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 23:09:19 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1257890959.4108.496.camel@laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0911102200480.2816@sister.anvils>
On Tue, 2009-11-10 at 22:02 +0000, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> CONFIG_DEBUG_SPINLOCK adds 12 or 16 bytes to a 32- or 64-bit spinlock_t,
> and CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC adds another 12 or 24 bytes to it: lockdep
> enables both of those, and CONFIG_LOCK_STAT adds 8 or 16 bytes to that.
>
> When 2.6.15 placed the split page table lock inside struct page (usually
> sized 32 or 56 bytes), only CONFIG_DEBUG_SPINLOCK was a possibility, and
> we ignored the enlargement (but fitted in CONFIG_GENERIC_LOCKBREAK's 4
> by letting the spinlock_t occupy both page->private and page->mapping).
>
> Should these debugging options be allowed to double the size of a struct
> page, when only one minority use of the page (as a page table) needs to
> fit a spinlock in there? Perhaps not.
>
> Take the easy way out: switch off SPLIT_PTLOCK_CPUS when DEBUG_SPINLOCK
> or DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC is in force. I've sometimes tried to be cleverer,
> kmallocing a cacheline for the spinlock when it doesn't fit, but given
> up each time. Falling back to mm->page_table_lock (as we do when ptlock
> is not split) lets lockdep check out the strictest path anyway.
Why? we know lockdep bloats stuff we never cared.. and hiding a popular
CONFIG option from lockdep doesn't seem like a good idea to me.
> Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hugh.dickins@tiscali.co.uk>
> ---
>
> mm/Kconfig | 6 ++++--
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> --- mm4/mm/Kconfig 2009-11-04 10:52:58.000000000 +0000
> +++ mm5/mm/Kconfig 2009-11-04 10:53:13.000000000 +0000
> @@ -161,11 +161,13 @@ config PAGEFLAGS_EXTENDED
> # Default to 4 for wider testing, though 8 might be more appropriate.
> # ARM's adjust_pte (unused if VIPT) depends on mm-wide page_table_lock.
> # PA-RISC 7xxx's spinlock_t would enlarge struct page from 32 to 44 bytes.
> +# DEBUG_SPINLOCK and DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC spinlock_t also enlarge struct page.
> #
> config SPLIT_PTLOCK_CPUS
> int
> - default "4096" if ARM && !CPU_CACHE_VIPT
> - default "4096" if PARISC && !PA20
> + default "999999" if ARM && !CPU_CACHE_VIPT
> + default "999999" if PARISC && !PA20
> + default "999999" if DEBUG_SPINLOCK || DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC
> default "4"
>
> #
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-11-10 22:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-11-10 21:50 [PATCH 0/6] mm: prepare for ksm swapping Hugh Dickins
2009-11-10 21:51 ` [PATCH 1/6] mm: define PAGE_MAPPING_FLAGS Hugh Dickins
2009-11-19 0:25 ` Rik van Riel
2009-11-10 21:55 ` [PATCH 2/6] mm: mlocking in try_to_unmap_one Hugh Dickins
2009-11-11 7:56 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-11-11 11:36 ` Hugh Dickins
2009-11-13 8:16 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-11-13 8:26 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-11-13 11:50 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2009-11-13 18:00 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-11-15 22:37 ` Hugh Dickins
2009-11-17 2:00 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-11-18 16:32 ` Hugh Dickins
2009-11-13 6:30 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-11-15 22:16 ` Hugh Dickins
2009-11-16 23:34 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-11-10 21:59 ` [PATCH 3/6] mm: CONFIG_MMU for PG_mlocked Hugh Dickins
2009-11-11 1:22 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-11-11 10:48 ` Hugh Dickins
2009-11-11 12:38 ` Andi Kleen
2009-11-10 22:00 ` [PATCH 4/6] mm: pass address down to rmap ones Hugh Dickins
2009-11-10 22:02 ` [PATCH 5/6] mm: stop ptlock enlarging struct page Hugh Dickins
2009-11-10 22:09 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2009-11-10 22:24 ` Hugh Dickins
2009-11-10 22:14 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-11-10 22:29 ` Hugh Dickins
2009-11-10 22:06 ` [PATCH 6/6] mm: sigbus instead of abusing oom Hugh Dickins
2009-11-11 2:37 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-11-11 2:42 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-11-11 4:35 ` Wu Fengguang
2009-11-11 5:51 ` Minchan Kim
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1257890959.4108.496.camel@laptop \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cl@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hugh.dickins@tiscali.co.uk \
--cc=ieidus@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox