From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail191.messagelabs.com (mail191.messagelabs.com [216.82.242.19]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E84B86B004D for ; Fri, 11 Sep 2009 09:54:26 -0400 (EDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] hugetlb: use only nodes with memory for huge pages From: Lee Schermerhorn In-Reply-To: <20090910163319.7fcfe815.akpm@linux-foundation.org> References: <20090909163127.12963.612.sendpatchset@localhost.localdomain> <20090909163211.12963.40411.sendpatchset@localhost.localdomain> <20090910163319.7fcfe815.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 09:54:29 -0400 Message-Id: <1252677269.4392.285.camel@useless.americas.hpqcorp.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org To: Andrew Morton Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-numa@vger.kernel.org, mel@csn.ul.ie, randy.dunlap@oracle.com, nacc@us.ibm.com, rientjes@google.com, agl@us.ibm.com, apw@canonical.com, eric.whitney@hp.com List-ID: On Thu, 2009-09-10 at 16:33 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > I ducked these three. It's already a bit late for the first six, and > that first six looked a bit half-baked to me. That's appropriate. These 3 were new in V6, and I have some cleanup, better comments, ... queued up. But the others: "half-baked" ??? More like 3/4, methinks. :) Anyway, I'm glad to see you've added them to mmotm. I've been testing each version of the series on x86_64 and, occassionally, ia64, with the libhugetlbfs regression tests and ad hoc testing of the mempolicy based constraint and the per node attributes. I believe that Mel has been testing on ppc. But, they definitely can benefit from more exposure. Lee -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org