From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
To: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <lrodriguez@Atheros.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
penberg@cs.helsinki.fi, mcgrof@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/5] kmemleak: few small cleanups and clear command support
Date: Mon, 07 Sep 2009 18:29:30 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1252344570.23780.110.camel@pc1117.cambridge.arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1252111494-7593-1-git-send-email-lrodriguez@atheros.com>
On Fri, 2009-09-04 at 17:44 -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> Here is my third respin, this time rebased ontop of:
>
> git://linux-arm.org/linux-2.6 kmemleak
>
> As suggested by Catalin we now clear the list by only painting reported
> unreferenced objects and the color we use is grey to ensure future
> scans are possible on these same objects to account for new allocations
> in the future referenced on the cleared objects.
>
> Patch 3 is now a little different, now with a paint_ptr() and
> a __paint_it() helper.
Thanks for the patches. They look ok now, I'll merge them tomorrow to my
kmemleak branch and give them a try.
> I tested this by clearing kmemleak after bootup, then writing my
> own buggy module which kmalloc()'d onto some internal pointer,
> scanned, unloaded, and scanned again and then saw a new shiny
> report come up:
BTW, kmemleak comes with a test module which does this.
--
Catalin
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-09-07 17:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-09-05 0:44 Luis R. Rodriguez
2009-09-05 0:44 ` [PATCH v3 1/5] kmemleak: use bool for true/false questions Luis R. Rodriguez
2009-09-05 0:44 ` [PATCH v3 2/5] kmemleak: add clear command support Luis R. Rodriguez
2009-09-08 16:11 ` Catalin Marinas
2009-09-08 16:16 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2009-09-05 0:44 ` [PATCH v3 3/5] kmemleak: move common painting code together Luis R. Rodriguez
2009-09-05 0:44 ` [PATCH v3 4/5] kmemleak: fix sparse warning over overshadowed flags Luis R. Rodriguez
2009-09-05 8:49 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-09-05 0:44 ` [PATCH v3 5/5] kmemleak: fix sparse warning for static declarations Luis R. Rodriguez
2009-09-07 17:29 ` Catalin Marinas [this message]
2009-09-08 16:14 ` [PATCH v3 0/5] kmemleak: few small cleanups and clear command support Luis R. Rodriguez
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1252344570.23780.110.camel@pc1117.cambridge.arm.com \
--to=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lrodriguez@Atheros.com \
--cc=mcgrof@gmail.com \
--cc=penberg@cs.helsinki.fi \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox