From: Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@hp.com>
To: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-numa@vger.kernel.org,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, Nishanth Aravamudan <nacc@us.ibm.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>, Adam Litke <agl@us.ibm.com>,
Andy Whitcroft <apw@canonical.com>,
eric.whitney@hp.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] hugetlb: add per node hstate attributes
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 16:49:40 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1251233380.16229.3.camel@useless.americas.hpqcorp.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090825133516.GE21335@csn.ul.ie>
On Tue, 2009-08-25 at 14:35 +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 03:29:02PM -0400, Lee Schermerhorn wrote:
> > <SNIP>
> >
> > Index: linux-2.6.31-rc6-mmotm-090820-1918/include/linux/node.h
> > ===================================================================
> > --- linux-2.6.31-rc6-mmotm-090820-1918.orig/include/linux/node.h 2009-08-24 12:12:44.000000000 -0400
> > +++ linux-2.6.31-rc6-mmotm-090820-1918/include/linux/node.h 2009-08-24 12:12:56.000000000 -0400
> > @@ -21,9 +21,12 @@
> >
> > #include <linux/sysdev.h>
> > #include <linux/cpumask.h>
> > +#include <linux/hugetlb.h>
> >
>
> Is this header inclusion necessary? It does not appear to be required by
> the structure modification (which is iffy in itself as discussed in the
> earlier mail) and it breaks build on x86-64.
Hi, Mel:
I recall that it is necessary to build. You can try w/o it.
>
> CC arch/x86/kernel/setup_percpu.o
> In file included from include/linux/pagemap.h:10,
> from include/linux/mempolicy.h:62,
> from include/linux/hugetlb.h:8,
> from include/linux/node.h:24,
> from include/linux/cpu.h:23,
> from /usr/local/autobench/var/tmp/build/arch/x86/include/asm/cpu.h:5,
> from arch/x86/kernel/setup_percpu.c:19:
> include/linux/highmem.h:53: error: static declaration of kmap follows non-static declaration
> /usr/local/autobench/var/tmp/build/arch/x86/include/asm/highmem.h:60: error: previous declaration of kmap was here
> include/linux/highmem.h:59: error: static declaration of kunmap follows non-static declaration
> /usr/local/autobench/var/tmp/build/arch/x86/include/asm/highmem.h:61: error: previous declaration of kunmap was here
> include/linux/highmem.h:63: error: static declaration of kmap_atomic follows non-static declaration
> /usr/local/autobench/var/tmp/build/arch/x86/include/asm/highmem.h:63: error: previous declaration of kmap_atomic was here
> make[2]: *** [arch/x86/kernel/setup_percpu.o] Error 1
> make[1]: *** [arch/x86/kernel] Error 2
I saw this. I've been testing on x86_64. I *thought* that it only
started showing up in a recent mmotm from changes in the linux-next
patch--e.g., a failure to set ARCH_HAS_KMAP or to handle appropriately
!ARCH_HAS_KMAP in highmem.h But maybe that was coincidental with my
adding the include.
Lee
>
>
>
> > struct node {
> > struct sys_device sysdev;
> > + struct kobject *hugepages_kobj;
> > + struct kobject *hstate_kobjs[HUGE_MAX_HSTATE];
> > };
> >
> > struct memory_block;
> >
>
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-08-25 20:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-08-24 19:24 [PATCH 0/5] hugetlb: numa control of persistent huge pages alloc/free Lee Schermerhorn
2009-08-24 19:25 ` [PATCH 1/5] hugetlb: rework hstate_next_node_* functions Lee Schermerhorn
2009-08-25 8:10 ` David Rientjes
2009-08-24 19:26 ` [PATCH 2/5] hugetlb: add nodemask arg to huge page alloc, free and surplus adjust fcns Lee Schermerhorn
2009-08-25 8:16 ` David Rientjes
2009-08-25 20:49 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2009-08-25 21:59 ` David Rientjes
2009-08-26 9:58 ` Mel Gorman
2009-08-24 19:27 ` [PATCH 3/5] hugetlb: derive huge pages nodes allowed from task mempolicy Lee Schermerhorn
2009-08-25 8:47 ` David Rientjes
2009-08-25 20:49 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2009-08-27 19:40 ` David Rientjes
2009-08-25 10:22 ` Mel Gorman
2009-08-24 19:29 ` [PATCH 4/5] hugetlb: add per node hstate attributes Lee Schermerhorn
2009-08-25 10:19 ` Mel Gorman
2009-08-25 20:49 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2009-08-26 10:11 ` Mel Gorman
2009-08-26 18:02 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2009-08-26 19:47 ` David Rientjes
2009-08-26 20:46 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2009-08-27 9:52 ` Mel Gorman
2009-08-27 19:35 ` David Rientjes
2009-08-28 12:56 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2009-08-26 18:04 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2009-08-27 10:23 ` Mel Gorman
2009-08-27 16:52 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2009-08-28 10:09 ` Mel Gorman
2009-08-25 13:35 ` Mel Gorman
2009-08-25 20:49 ` Lee Schermerhorn [this message]
2009-08-26 10:12 ` Mel Gorman
2009-08-24 19:30 ` [PATCH 5/5] hugetlb: update hugetlb documentation for mempolicy based management Lee Schermerhorn
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1251233380.16229.3.camel@useless.americas.hpqcorp.net \
--to=lee.schermerhorn@hp.com \
--cc=agl@us.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=apw@canonical.com \
--cc=eric.whitney@hp.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-numa@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mel@csn.ul.ie \
--cc=nacc@us.ibm.com \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox