From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail137.messagelabs.com (mail137.messagelabs.com [216.82.249.19]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DA7B56B0055 for ; Wed, 8 Jul 2009 05:55:16 -0400 (EDT) Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/3] kmemleak: Add callbacks to the bootmem allocator From: Catalin Marinas In-Reply-To: <20090708094643.GA1956@cmpxchg.org> References: <20090706104654.16051.44029.stgit@pc1117.cambridge.arm.com> <20090706105155.16051.59597.stgit@pc1117.cambridge.arm.com> <1246950530.24285.7.camel@penberg-laptop> <20090707165350.GA2782@cmpxchg.org> <1247004586.5710.16.camel@pc1117.cambridge.arm.com> <20090708094643.GA1956@cmpxchg.org> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Wed, 08 Jul 2009 11:02:35 +0100 Message-Id: <1247047355.6595.16.camel@pc1117.cambridge.arm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org To: Johannes Weiner Cc: Pekka Enberg , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar List-ID: On Wed, 2009-07-08 at 11:46 +0200, Johannes Weiner wrote: > On Tue, Jul 07, 2009 at 11:09:46PM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote: > > > It seems that alloc_bootmem_core() is central to all the bootmem > > allocations. Is it OK to place the kmemleak_alloc hook only in this > > function? > > > > diff --git a/mm/bootmem.c b/mm/bootmem.c > > index 5a649a0..74cbb34 100644 > > --- a/mm/bootmem.c > > +++ b/mm/bootmem.c > > @@ -520,6 +520,7 @@ find_block: > > region = phys_to_virt(PFN_PHYS(bdata->node_min_pfn) + > > start_off); > > memset(region, 0, size); > > + kmemleak_alloc(region, size, 1, 0); > > return region; > > } > > Yes, that should work. Thanks. May I add your Acked-by line to the final patch? -- Catalin -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org