From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail138.messagelabs.com (mail138.messagelabs.com [216.82.249.35]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF9BB6B005D for ; Fri, 26 Jun 2009 04:43:53 -0400 (EDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] fix RCU-callback-after-kmem_cache_destroy problem in sl[aou]b From: Pekka Enberg In-Reply-To: <20090625220837.GD8852@linux.vnet.ibm.com> References: <20090625193137.GA16861@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <1245965239.21085.393.camel@calx> <20090625220837.GD8852@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 11:45:13 +0300 Message-Id: <1246005913.27533.21.camel@penberg-laptop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org To: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com Cc: Matt Mackall , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, cl@linux-foundation.org, jdb@comx.dk, Nick Piggin List-ID: On Thu, 2009-06-25 at 15:08 -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 04:27:19PM -0500, Matt Mackall wrote: > > On Thu, 2009-06-25 at 12:31 -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > > Hello! > > > > > > Jesper noted that kmem_cache_destroy() invokes synchronize_rcu() rather > > > than rcu_barrier() in the SLAB_DESTROY_BY_RCU case, which could result > > > in RCU callbacks accessing a kmem_cache after it had been destroyed. > > > > > > The following untested (might not even compile) patch proposes a fix. > > > > Acked-by: Matt Mackall > > > > Nick, you'll want to make sure you get this in SLQB. > > > > > Reported-by: Jesper Dangaard Brouer > > And I seem to have blown Jesper's email address (apologies, Jesper!), so: > > Reported-by: Jesper Dangaard Brouer Compiles and boots here so I went ahead and applied the patch. ;) Thanks a lot Paul! Pekka -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org