linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>
To: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>,
	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
	Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>,
	yanmin.zhang@intel.com, Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>,
	linuxram@us.ibm.com
Cc: linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 3/3] Do not unconditionally treat zones that fail zone_reclaim() as full
Date: Mon,  8 Jun 2009 14:01:30 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1244466090-10711-4-git-send-email-mel@csn.ul.ie> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1244466090-10711-1-git-send-email-mel@csn.ul.ie>

On NUMA machines, the administrator can configure zone_reclaim_mode that
is a more targetted form of direct reclaim. On machines with large NUMA
distances for example, a zone_reclaim_mode defaults to 1 meaning that clean
unmapped pages will be reclaimed if the zone watermarks are not being
met. The problem is that zone_reclaim() failing at all means the zone
gets marked full.

This can cause situations where a zone is usable, but is being skipped
because it has been considered full. Take a situation where a large tmpfs
mount is occuping a large percentage of memory overall. The pages do not
get cleaned or reclaimed by zone_reclaim(), but the zone gets marked full
and the zonelist cache considers them not worth trying in the future.

This patch makes zone_reclaim() return more fine-grained information about
what occured when zone_reclaim() failued. The zone only gets marked full if
it really is unreclaimable. If it's a case that the scan did not occur or
if enough pages were not reclaimed with the limited reclaim_mode, then the
zone is simply skipped.

There is a side-effect to this patch. Currently, if zone_reclaim()
successfully reclaimed SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX, an allocation attempt would
go ahead. With this patch applied, zone watermarks are rechecked after
zone_reclaim() does some work.

Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>
---
 mm/internal.h   |    4 ++++
 mm/page_alloc.c |   26 ++++++++++++++++++++++----
 mm/vmscan.c     |   10 +++++-----
 3 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/internal.h b/mm/internal.h
index 987bb03..090c267 100644
--- a/mm/internal.h
+++ b/mm/internal.h
@@ -284,4 +284,8 @@ int __get_user_pages(struct task_struct *tsk, struct mm_struct *mm,
 		     unsigned long start, int len, int flags,
 		     struct page **pages, struct vm_area_struct **vmas);
 
+#define ZONE_RECLAIM_NOSCAN	-2
+#define ZONE_RECLAIM_FULL	-1
+#define ZONE_RECLAIM_SOME	0
+#define ZONE_RECLAIM_SUCCESS	1
 #endif
diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
index fe753ec..ce2f684 100644
--- a/mm/page_alloc.c
+++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
@@ -1420,20 +1420,38 @@ zonelist_scan:
 
 		if (!(alloc_flags & ALLOC_NO_WATERMARKS)) {
 			unsigned long mark;
+			int ret;
 			if (alloc_flags & ALLOC_WMARK_MIN)
 				mark = zone->pages_min;
 			else if (alloc_flags & ALLOC_WMARK_LOW)
 				mark = zone->pages_low;
 			else
 				mark = zone->pages_high;
-			if (!zone_watermark_ok(zone, order, mark,
-				    classzone_idx, alloc_flags)) {
-				if (!zone_reclaim_mode ||
-				    !zone_reclaim(zone, gfp_mask, order))
+			if (zone_watermark_ok(zone, order, mark,
+				    classzone_idx, alloc_flags))
+				goto try_this_zone;
+
+			if (zone_reclaim_mode == 0)
+				goto this_zone_full;
+
+			ret = zone_reclaim(zone, gfp_mask, order);
+			switch (ret) {
+				case ZONE_RECLAIM_NOSCAN:
+					/* did not scan */
+					goto try_next_zone;
+				case ZONE_RECLAIM_FULL:
+					/* scanned but unreclaimable */
 					goto this_zone_full;
+				default:
+					/* did we reclaim enough */
+					if (!zone_watermark_ok(zone, order,
+							mark, classzone_idx,
+							alloc_flags))
+						goto try_next_zone;
 			}
 		}
 
+try_this_zone:
 		page = buffered_rmqueue(preferred_zone, zone, order, gfp_mask);
 		if (page)
 			break;
diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
index ffe2f32..84cdae2 100644
--- a/mm/vmscan.c
+++ b/mm/vmscan.c
@@ -2409,7 +2409,7 @@ int zone_reclaim(struct zone *zone, gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order)
 	if (pagecache_reclaimable <= zone->min_unmapped_pages
 	    && zone_page_state(zone, NR_SLAB_RECLAIMABLE)
 			<= zone->min_slab_pages)
-		return 0;
+		return ZONE_RECLAIM_NOSCAN;
 
 	/* Do not attempt a scan if scanning failed recently */
 	if (time_before(jiffies,
@@ -2417,13 +2417,13 @@ int zone_reclaim(struct zone *zone, gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order)
 		return 0;
 
 	if (zone_is_all_unreclaimable(zone))
-		return 0;
+		return ZONE_RECLAIM_FULL;
 
 	/*
 	 * Do not scan if the allocation should not be delayed.
 	 */
 	if (!(gfp_mask & __GFP_WAIT) || (current->flags & PF_MEMALLOC))
-			return 0;
+			return ZONE_RECLAIM_NOSCAN;
 
 	/*
 	 * Only run zone reclaim on the local zone or on zones that do not
@@ -2433,10 +2433,10 @@ int zone_reclaim(struct zone *zone, gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order)
 	 */
 	node_id = zone_to_nid(zone);
 	if (node_state(node_id, N_CPU) && node_id != numa_node_id())
-		return 0;
+		return ZONE_RECLAIM_NOSCAN;
 
 	if (zone_test_and_set_flag(zone, ZONE_RECLAIM_LOCKED))
-		return 0;
+		return ZONE_RECLAIM_NOSCAN;
 	ret = __zone_reclaim(zone, gfp_mask, order);
 	zone_clear_flag(zone, ZONE_RECLAIM_LOCKED);
 
-- 
1.5.6.5

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-06-08 11:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-06-08 13:01 [PATCH 0/3] [RFC] Functional fix to zone_reclaim() and bring behaviour more in line with expectations Mel Gorman
2009-06-08 13:01 ` [PATCH 1/3] Reintroduce zone_reclaim_interval for when zone_reclaim() scans and fails to avoid CPU spinning at 100% on NUMA Mel Gorman
2009-06-08 13:31   ` Rik van Riel
2009-06-08 13:54     ` Mel Gorman
2009-06-08 14:33       ` Christoph Lameter
2009-06-08 14:38         ` Mel Gorman
2009-06-08 14:55           ` Christoph Lameter
2009-06-08 15:11             ` Mel Gorman
2009-06-10  5:23               ` Andrew Morton
2009-06-10  6:44                 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-06-10 10:00                 ` Mel Gorman
2009-06-08 14:48       ` Rik van Riel
2009-06-09  8:08         ` Mel Gorman
2009-06-09  1:58   ` Wu Fengguang
2009-06-09  8:14     ` Mel Gorman
2009-06-09  8:25       ` Wu Fengguang
2009-06-09  8:31         ` Mel Gorman
2009-06-09  9:07           ` Wu Fengguang
2009-06-09  9:40             ` Mel Gorman
2009-06-09 13:38               ` Wu Fengguang
2009-06-09 15:06                 ` Mel Gorman
2009-06-10  2:14                   ` Wu Fengguang
2009-06-10  9:54                     ` Mel Gorman
2009-06-09  7:48   ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-06-09  8:18     ` Mel Gorman
2009-06-09  8:45       ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-06-09  9:42         ` Mel Gorman
2009-06-09  9:45           ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-06-09  9:59             ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-06-09 10:44               ` Mel Gorman
2009-06-09 10:50                 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-06-08 13:01 ` [PATCH 2/3] Properly account for the number of page cache pages zone_reclaim() can reclaim Mel Gorman
2009-06-08 14:25   ` Christoph Lameter
2009-06-08 14:36     ` Mel Gorman
2009-06-09  2:25   ` Wu Fengguang
2009-06-09  8:27     ` Mel Gorman
2009-06-09  8:45       ` Wu Fengguang
2009-06-09 10:48         ` Mel Gorman
2009-06-09 12:08           ` Wu Fengguang
2009-06-09  8:55       ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-06-09  2:37   ` Wu Fengguang
2009-06-09  8:19   ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-06-09  8:47     ` Mel Gorman
2009-06-08 13:01 ` Mel Gorman [this message]
2009-06-08 14:32   ` [PATCH 3/3] Do not unconditionally treat zones that fail zone_reclaim() as full Christoph Lameter
2009-06-08 14:43     ` Mel Gorman
2009-06-09  3:11   ` Wu Fengguang
2009-06-09  8:50     ` Mel Gorman
2009-06-09  7:48   ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-06-09  9:25     ` Mel Gorman
2009-06-09 12:05       ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-06-09 13:28         ` Mel Gorman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1244466090-10711-4-git-send-email-mel@csn.ul.ie \
    --to=mel@csn.ul.ie \
    --cc=cl@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
    --cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linuxram@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=riel@redhat.com \
    --cc=yanmin.zhang@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox