From: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>
To: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>,
yanmin.zhang@intel.com, Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>,
linuxram@us.ibm.com
Cc: linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 3/3] Do not unconditionally treat zones that fail zone_reclaim() as full
Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 14:01:30 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1244466090-10711-4-git-send-email-mel@csn.ul.ie> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1244466090-10711-1-git-send-email-mel@csn.ul.ie>
On NUMA machines, the administrator can configure zone_reclaim_mode that
is a more targetted form of direct reclaim. On machines with large NUMA
distances for example, a zone_reclaim_mode defaults to 1 meaning that clean
unmapped pages will be reclaimed if the zone watermarks are not being
met. The problem is that zone_reclaim() failing at all means the zone
gets marked full.
This can cause situations where a zone is usable, but is being skipped
because it has been considered full. Take a situation where a large tmpfs
mount is occuping a large percentage of memory overall. The pages do not
get cleaned or reclaimed by zone_reclaim(), but the zone gets marked full
and the zonelist cache considers them not worth trying in the future.
This patch makes zone_reclaim() return more fine-grained information about
what occured when zone_reclaim() failued. The zone only gets marked full if
it really is unreclaimable. If it's a case that the scan did not occur or
if enough pages were not reclaimed with the limited reclaim_mode, then the
zone is simply skipped.
There is a side-effect to this patch. Currently, if zone_reclaim()
successfully reclaimed SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX, an allocation attempt would
go ahead. With this patch applied, zone watermarks are rechecked after
zone_reclaim() does some work.
Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>
---
mm/internal.h | 4 ++++
mm/page_alloc.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++----
mm/vmscan.c | 10 +++++-----
3 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/internal.h b/mm/internal.h
index 987bb03..090c267 100644
--- a/mm/internal.h
+++ b/mm/internal.h
@@ -284,4 +284,8 @@ int __get_user_pages(struct task_struct *tsk, struct mm_struct *mm,
unsigned long start, int len, int flags,
struct page **pages, struct vm_area_struct **vmas);
+#define ZONE_RECLAIM_NOSCAN -2
+#define ZONE_RECLAIM_FULL -1
+#define ZONE_RECLAIM_SOME 0
+#define ZONE_RECLAIM_SUCCESS 1
#endif
diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
index fe753ec..ce2f684 100644
--- a/mm/page_alloc.c
+++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
@@ -1420,20 +1420,38 @@ zonelist_scan:
if (!(alloc_flags & ALLOC_NO_WATERMARKS)) {
unsigned long mark;
+ int ret;
if (alloc_flags & ALLOC_WMARK_MIN)
mark = zone->pages_min;
else if (alloc_flags & ALLOC_WMARK_LOW)
mark = zone->pages_low;
else
mark = zone->pages_high;
- if (!zone_watermark_ok(zone, order, mark,
- classzone_idx, alloc_flags)) {
- if (!zone_reclaim_mode ||
- !zone_reclaim(zone, gfp_mask, order))
+ if (zone_watermark_ok(zone, order, mark,
+ classzone_idx, alloc_flags))
+ goto try_this_zone;
+
+ if (zone_reclaim_mode == 0)
+ goto this_zone_full;
+
+ ret = zone_reclaim(zone, gfp_mask, order);
+ switch (ret) {
+ case ZONE_RECLAIM_NOSCAN:
+ /* did not scan */
+ goto try_next_zone;
+ case ZONE_RECLAIM_FULL:
+ /* scanned but unreclaimable */
goto this_zone_full;
+ default:
+ /* did we reclaim enough */
+ if (!zone_watermark_ok(zone, order,
+ mark, classzone_idx,
+ alloc_flags))
+ goto try_next_zone;
}
}
+try_this_zone:
page = buffered_rmqueue(preferred_zone, zone, order, gfp_mask);
if (page)
break;
diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
index ffe2f32..84cdae2 100644
--- a/mm/vmscan.c
+++ b/mm/vmscan.c
@@ -2409,7 +2409,7 @@ int zone_reclaim(struct zone *zone, gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order)
if (pagecache_reclaimable <= zone->min_unmapped_pages
&& zone_page_state(zone, NR_SLAB_RECLAIMABLE)
<= zone->min_slab_pages)
- return 0;
+ return ZONE_RECLAIM_NOSCAN;
/* Do not attempt a scan if scanning failed recently */
if (time_before(jiffies,
@@ -2417,13 +2417,13 @@ int zone_reclaim(struct zone *zone, gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order)
return 0;
if (zone_is_all_unreclaimable(zone))
- return 0;
+ return ZONE_RECLAIM_FULL;
/*
* Do not scan if the allocation should not be delayed.
*/
if (!(gfp_mask & __GFP_WAIT) || (current->flags & PF_MEMALLOC))
- return 0;
+ return ZONE_RECLAIM_NOSCAN;
/*
* Only run zone reclaim on the local zone or on zones that do not
@@ -2433,10 +2433,10 @@ int zone_reclaim(struct zone *zone, gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order)
*/
node_id = zone_to_nid(zone);
if (node_state(node_id, N_CPU) && node_id != numa_node_id())
- return 0;
+ return ZONE_RECLAIM_NOSCAN;
if (zone_test_and_set_flag(zone, ZONE_RECLAIM_LOCKED))
- return 0;
+ return ZONE_RECLAIM_NOSCAN;
ret = __zone_reclaim(zone, gfp_mask, order);
zone_clear_flag(zone, ZONE_RECLAIM_LOCKED);
--
1.5.6.5
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-06-08 11:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-06-08 13:01 [PATCH 0/3] [RFC] Functional fix to zone_reclaim() and bring behaviour more in line with expectations Mel Gorman
2009-06-08 13:01 ` [PATCH 1/3] Reintroduce zone_reclaim_interval for when zone_reclaim() scans and fails to avoid CPU spinning at 100% on NUMA Mel Gorman
2009-06-08 13:31 ` Rik van Riel
2009-06-08 13:54 ` Mel Gorman
2009-06-08 14:33 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-06-08 14:38 ` Mel Gorman
2009-06-08 14:55 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-06-08 15:11 ` Mel Gorman
2009-06-10 5:23 ` Andrew Morton
2009-06-10 6:44 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-06-10 10:00 ` Mel Gorman
2009-06-08 14:48 ` Rik van Riel
2009-06-09 8:08 ` Mel Gorman
2009-06-09 1:58 ` Wu Fengguang
2009-06-09 8:14 ` Mel Gorman
2009-06-09 8:25 ` Wu Fengguang
2009-06-09 8:31 ` Mel Gorman
2009-06-09 9:07 ` Wu Fengguang
2009-06-09 9:40 ` Mel Gorman
2009-06-09 13:38 ` Wu Fengguang
2009-06-09 15:06 ` Mel Gorman
2009-06-10 2:14 ` Wu Fengguang
2009-06-10 9:54 ` Mel Gorman
2009-06-09 7:48 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-06-09 8:18 ` Mel Gorman
2009-06-09 8:45 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-06-09 9:42 ` Mel Gorman
2009-06-09 9:45 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-06-09 9:59 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-06-09 10:44 ` Mel Gorman
2009-06-09 10:50 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-06-08 13:01 ` [PATCH 2/3] Properly account for the number of page cache pages zone_reclaim() can reclaim Mel Gorman
2009-06-08 14:25 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-06-08 14:36 ` Mel Gorman
2009-06-09 2:25 ` Wu Fengguang
2009-06-09 8:27 ` Mel Gorman
2009-06-09 8:45 ` Wu Fengguang
2009-06-09 10:48 ` Mel Gorman
2009-06-09 12:08 ` Wu Fengguang
2009-06-09 8:55 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-06-09 2:37 ` Wu Fengguang
2009-06-09 8:19 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-06-09 8:47 ` Mel Gorman
2009-06-08 13:01 ` Mel Gorman [this message]
2009-06-08 14:32 ` [PATCH 3/3] Do not unconditionally treat zones that fail zone_reclaim() as full Christoph Lameter
2009-06-08 14:43 ` Mel Gorman
2009-06-09 3:11 ` Wu Fengguang
2009-06-09 8:50 ` Mel Gorman
2009-06-09 7:48 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-06-09 9:25 ` Mel Gorman
2009-06-09 12:05 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-06-09 13:28 ` Mel Gorman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1244466090-10711-4-git-send-email-mel@csn.ul.ie \
--to=mel@csn.ul.ie \
--cc=cl@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
--cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linuxram@us.ibm.com \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=yanmin.zhang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox