From: Eric Anholt <eric@anholt.net>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Kyle McMartin <kyle@mcmartin.ca>,
airlied@redhat.com, dri-devel@lists.sf.net,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org,
stable@kernel.org, hugh.dickins@tiscali.co.uk,
linux-mm@kvack.org, shaohua.li@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm: i915: ensure objects are allocated below 4GB on PAE
Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 14:35:30 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1243373730.8400.26.camel@gaiman.anholt.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1243365473.23657.32.camel@twins>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1183 bytes --]
On Tue, 2009-05-26 at 21:17 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-05-26 at 12:27 -0400, Kyle McMartin wrote:
> > From: Kyle McMartin <kyle@redhat.com>
> >
> > Ensure we allocate GEM objects below 4GB on PAE machines, otherwise
> > misery ensues. This patch is based on a patch found on dri-devel by
> > Shaohua Li, but Keith P. expressed reticence that the changes unfairly
> > penalized other hardware.
> >
> > (The mm/shmem.c hunk is necessary to ensure the DMA32 flag isn't used
> > by the slab allocator via radix_tree_preload, which will hit a
> > WARN_ON.)
>
> Why is this, is the gart not PAE friendly?
>
> Seems to me its a grand way of promoting 64bit hard/soft-ware.
No, the GART's fine. But the APIs required to make the AGP code
PAE-friendly got deprecated, so the patches to fix the AGP code got
NAKed, and Venkatesh never sent out his patches to undeprecate the APIs
and use them.
It's been like 6 months now, and it's absurd. I'd like to see this
patch go in so people's graphics can start working again and stop
corrupting system memory.
--
Eric Anholt
eric@anholt.net eric.anholt@intel.com
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 197 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-05-26 21:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-05-26 16:27 Kyle McMartin
2009-05-26 19:17 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-05-26 21:35 ` Eric Anholt [this message]
2009-05-26 21:41 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-05-26 21:43 ` Kyle McMartin
2009-05-26 22:55 ` Hugh Dickins
2009-05-27 0:18 ` Kyle McMartin
2009-05-27 0:42 ` Shaohua Li
2009-05-27 17:40 ` Eric Anholt
2009-05-27 18:23 ` Kyle McMartin
2009-05-31 0:49 ` Shaohua Li
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1243373730.8400.26.camel@gaiman.anholt.net \
--to=eric@anholt.net \
--cc=airlied@redhat.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.sf.net \
--cc=hugh.dickins@tiscali.co.uk \
--cc=jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org \
--cc=kyle@mcmartin.ca \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=shaohua.li@intel.com \
--cc=stable@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox