From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail137.messagelabs.com (mail137.messagelabs.com [216.82.249.19]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B853B6B00E5 for ; Wed, 13 May 2009 06:36:53 -0400 (EDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH] Kconfig: CONFIG_UNEVICTABLE_LRU move into EMBEDDED submenu From: David Woodhouse In-Reply-To: <20090513191221.674bc543.minchan.kim@barrios-desktop> References: <20090513172904.7234.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com> <20090513175152.1590c117.minchan.kim@barrios-desktop> <20090513175539.723A.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com> <20090513191221.674bc543.minchan.kim@barrios-desktop> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 11:37:17 +0100 Message-Id: <1242211037.24436.552.camel@macbook.infradead.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org To: Minchan Kim Cc: KOSAKI Motohiro , LKML , linux-mm , Andrew Morton , Lee Schermerhorn , Matt Mackall List-ID: On Wed, 2009-05-13 at 19:12 +0900, Minchan Kim wrote: > > No. > > As far as I know, many embedded guys use this configuration. > > they hate unexpected latency by reclaim. !UNEVICTABLE_LRU increase > > unexpectability largely. > > As I said previous(http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/3/16/209), Many embedded > environment have a small ram. It doesn't have a big impact in such > case. > > Let CCed embedded matainers. > I won't have a objection if embedded maintainers ack this. I probably wouldn't be cheerleading for it if you wanted to make it optional when it wasn't before -- but I suppose we might as well preserve the option under CONFIG_EMBEDDED if the alternative is to lose it completely. Acked-by: David Woodhouse -- David Woodhouse Open Source Technology Centre David.Woodhouse@intel.com Intel Corporation -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org