Re: [PATCH 1/2] x86/mm: maintain a percpu "in get_user_pages_fast" flag

[Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>]

On Fri, 2009-03-27 at 22:01 -0700, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> Avi Kivity wrote:
> > Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> >> get_user_pages_fast() relies on cross-cpu tlb flushes being a barrier
> >> between clearing and setting a pte, and before freeing a pagetable page.
> >> It usually does this by disabling interrupts to hold off IPIs, but
> >> some tlb flush implementations don't use IPIs for tlb flushes, and
> >> must use another mechanism.
> >>
> >> In this change, add in_gup_cpumask, which is a cpumask of cpus currently
> >> performing a get_user_pages_fast traversal of a pagetable.  A cross-cpu
> >> tlb flush function can use this to determine whether it should hold-off
> >> on the flush until the gup_fast has finished.
> >>
> >> @@ -255,6 +260,10 @@ int get_user_pages_fast(unsigned long start, int 
> >> nr_pages, int write,
> >>      * address down to the the page and take a ref on it.
> >>      */
> >>     local_irq_disable();
> >> +
> >> +    cpu = smp_processor_id();
> >> +    cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, in_gup_cpumask);
> >> +
> >
> > This will bounce a cacheline, every time.  Please wrap in CONFIG_XEN 
> > and skip at runtime if Xen is not enabled.
> 
> Every time?  Only when running successive gup_fasts on different cpus, 
> and only twice per gup_fast. (What's the typical page count?  I see that 
> kvm and lguest are page-at-a-time users, but presumably direct IO has 
> larger batches.)

The larger the batch, the longer the irq-off latency, I've just proposed
adding a batch mechanism to gup_fast() to limit this.




--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>