Re: Increase dirty_ratio and dirty_background_ratio?

[Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>]

On Fri, 2009-01-09 at 14:31 -0800, david@lang.hm wrote:

> for that matter, it's not getting to where it makes sense to have wildly 
> different storage on a machine
> 
> 10's of GB of SSD for super-fast read-mostly
> 100's of GB of high-speed SCSI for fast writes
> TB's of SATA for high capacity
> 
> does it make sense to consider tracking the dirty pages per-destination so 
> that in addition to only having one process writing to the drive at a time 
> you can also allow for different amounts of data to be queued per device?
> 
> on a machine with 10's of GB of ram it becomes possible to hit the point 
> where at one point you could have the entire SSD worth of data queued up 
> to write, and at another point have the same total amount of data queued 
> for the SATA storage and it's a fraction of a percent of the size of the 
> storage.

That's exactly what we do today. Dirty pages are tracked per backing
device and the writeback cache size is proportionally divided based on
recent write speed ratios of the devices.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>