Re: Increase dirty_ratio and dirty_background_ratio?

[Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>]

On Fri, 2009-01-09 at 19:02 +0100, Jan Kara wrote:

>   What we observe in the seekwatcher graphs is, that there are three
> processes writing back the single database file in parallel (2 pdflush
> threads because the machine has 2 CPUs, and the database process itself
> because of dirty throttling). Each of the processes is writing back the
> file at a different offset and so they together create even more random IO
> (I'm attaching the graph and can provide blocktrace data if someone is
> interested). If there was just one process doing the writeback, we'd be
> writing back those data considerably faster...

I spent some time trying similar things for btrfs, and went as far as
making my own writeback thread and changing pdflush and throttled writes
to wait on it.  It was a great hack, but in the end I found the real
problem was the way write_cache_pages is advancing the page_index.

You probably remember the related ext4 discussion, and you could try my
simple patch in this workload to see if it helps ext3.

http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/10/1/278

Ext3 may need similar tricks.

-chris


--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>