From: Dave Hansen <dave@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Oren Laadan <orenl@cs.columbia.edu>
Cc: linux-api@vger.kernel.org, containers@lists.linux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC v10][PATCH 09/13] Restore open file descriprtors
Date: Mon, 01 Dec 2008 17:12:06 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1228180326.2971.128.camel@nimitz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <49345086.4@cs.columbia.edu>
On Mon, 2008-12-01 at 16:00 -0500, Oren Laadan wrote:
> Dave Hansen wrote:
> > On Mon, 2008-12-01 at 15:41 -0500, Oren Laadan wrote:
> >>>>> + fd = cr_attach_file(file); /* no need to cleanup 'file' below */
> >>>>> + if (fd < 0) {
> >>>>> + filp_close(file, NULL);
> >>>>> + ret = fd;
> >>>>> + goto out;
> >>>>> + }
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> + /* register new <objref, file> tuple in hash table */
> >>>>> + ret = cr_obj_add_ref(ctx, file, parent, CR_OBJ_FILE, 0);
> >>>>> + if (ret < 0)
> >>>>> + goto out;
> >>>> Who said that file still exists at that point?
> >> Correct. This call should move higher up befor ethe call to cr_attach_file()
> >
> > Is that sufficient? It seems like we're depending on the fd's reference
> > to the 'struct file' to keep it valid in the hash. If something happens
> > to the fd (like the other thread messing with it) the 'struct file' can
> > still go away.
> >
> > Shouldn't we do another get_file() for the hash's reference?
>
> When a shared object is inserted to the hash we automatically take another
> reference to it (according to its type) for as long as it remains in the
> hash. See: 'cr_obj_ref_grab()' and 'cr_obj_ref_drop()'. So by moving that
> call higher up, we protect the struct file.
We also need to document that we depend on this reference in the hash to
keep the object around. Take a look at cr_read_fd_data(). Once that
cr_attach_file() has been performed, the only thing keeping the 'file'
around is the hash reference. If someone happened to remove it from the
hash, the vfs_llseek() below would be bogus.
I don't know how we document that the hash is one-way: writes only and
no later deletions.
-- Dave
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-12-02 1:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-11-27 1:04 [RFC v10][PATCH 00/13] Kernel based checkpoint/restart Oren Laadan
2008-11-27 1:04 ` [RFC v10][PATCH 01/13] Create syscalls: sys_checkpoint, sys_restart Oren Laadan
2008-11-27 1:04 ` [RFC v10][PATCH 02/13] Checkpoint/restart: initial documentation Oren Laadan
2008-11-28 10:45 ` Al Viro
2008-12-01 18:15 ` Dave Hansen
2008-11-27 1:04 ` [RFC v10][PATCH 03/13] General infrastructure for checkpoint restart Oren Laadan
2008-11-27 1:04 ` [RFC v10][PATCH 04/13] x86 support for checkpoint/restart Oren Laadan
2008-11-27 1:04 ` [RFC v10][PATCH 05/13] Dump memory address space Oren Laadan
2008-11-28 10:53 ` Al Viro
2008-12-01 18:00 ` Dave Hansen
2008-12-01 20:57 ` Oren Laadan
2008-11-27 1:04 ` [RFC v10][PATCH 06/13] Restore " Oren Laadan
2008-11-27 1:04 ` [RFC v10][PATCH 07/13] Infrastructure for shared objects Oren Laadan
2008-11-27 1:04 ` [RFC v10][PATCH 08/13] Dump open file descriptors Oren Laadan
2008-11-28 10:19 ` Al Viro
2008-12-01 17:47 ` Dave Hansen
2008-12-01 20:23 ` Oren Laadan
2008-12-01 20:51 ` Dave Hansen
2008-12-01 21:02 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-12-01 21:25 ` Dave Hansen
2008-12-01 21:20 ` Oren Laadan
2008-11-27 1:04 ` [RFC v10][PATCH 09/13] Restore open file descriprtors Oren Laadan
2008-11-28 11:27 ` Al Viro
2008-12-01 19:22 ` Dave Hansen
2008-12-01 20:41 ` Oren Laadan
2008-12-01 20:54 ` Dave Hansen
2008-12-01 21:00 ` Oren Laadan
2008-12-01 21:07 ` Dave Hansen
2008-12-02 1:31 ` Dave Hansen
2008-12-02 1:12 ` Dave Hansen [this message]
2008-11-27 1:04 ` [RFC v10][PATCH 10/13] External checkpoint of a task other than ourself Oren Laadan
2008-11-27 1:04 ` [RFC v10][PATCH 11/13] Track in-kernel when we expect checkpoint/restart to work Oren Laadan
2008-11-27 1:04 ` [RFC v10][PATCH 12/13] Checkpoint multiple processes Oren Laadan
2008-11-27 1:04 ` [RFC v10][PATCH 13/13] Restart " Oren Laadan
2008-12-03 23:58 ` [RFC v10][PATCH 00/13] Kernel based checkpoint/restart Serge E. Hallyn
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1228180326.2971.128.camel@nimitz \
--to=dave@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=containers@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=orenl@cs.columbia.edu \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
--cc=viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox