From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Subject: Re: [RFC] another crazy idea to get rid of mmap_sem in faults From: Peter Zijlstra In-Reply-To: <1228145238.18834.29.camel@lts-notebook> References: <1227886959.4454.4421.camel@twins> <1228142895.7140.43.camel@twins> <1228145238.18834.29.camel@lts-notebook> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Mon, 01 Dec 2008 16:33:30 +0100 Message-Id: <1228145610.7070.18.camel@twins> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Lee Schermerhorn Cc: Christoph Lameter , Nick Piggin , Linus Torvalds , hugh , Paul E McKenney , Andrew Morton , Ingo Molnar , linux-mm List-ID: On Mon, 2008-12-01 at 10:27 -0500, Lee Schermerhorn wrote: > mlock(), mprotect() and mbind() [others?] can also split/merge vmas > under exclusive mmap_sem to accomodate the changed attributes. Right, all those should be OK as described in the Split/Merge scenarios. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org