linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>
To: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [patch 1/2] mm: pagecache allocation gfp fixes
Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2008 12:28:57 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1227781737.25160.3.camel@penberg-laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20081127101837.GJ28285@wotan.suse.de>

On Thu, 2008-11-27 at 11:18 +0100, Nick Piggin wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 11:52:40AM +0200, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> > > -               err = add_to_page_cache_lru(page, mapping, index, gfp_mask);
> > > +               err = add_to_page_cache_lru(page, mapping, index,
> > > +                       (gfp_mask & (__GFP_FS|__GFP_IO|__GFP_WAIT|__GFP_HIGH)));
> > 
> > Can we use GFP_RECLAIM_MASK here? I mean, surely we need to pass
> > __GFP_NOFAIL, for example, down to radix_tree_preload() et al?
> 
> Updated patch.
> 
> --
> Frustratingly, gfp_t is really divided into two classes of flags. One are the
> context dependent ones (can we sleep? can we enter filesystem? block subsystem?
> should we use some extra reserves, etc.). The other ones are the type of memory
> required and depend on how the algorithm is implemented rather than the point
> at which the memory is allocated (highmem? dma memory? etc).
> 
> Some of functions which allocate a page and add it to page cache take a gfp_t,
> but sometimes those functions or their callers aren't really doing the right
> thing: when allocating pagecache page, the memory type should be
> mapping_gfp_mask(mapping). When allocating radix tree nodes, the memory type
> should be kernel mapped (not highmem) memory. The gfp_t argument should only
> really be needed for context dependent options.
> 
> This patch doesn't really solve that tangle in a nice way, but it does attempt
> to fix a couple of bugs. find_or_create_page changes its radix-tree allocation
> to only include the main context dependent flags in order so the pagecache
> page may be allocated from arbitrary types of memory without affecting the
> radix-tree. Then grab_cache_page_nowait() is changed to allocate radix-tree
> nodes with GFP_NOFS, because it is not supposed to reenter the filesystem.
> 
> Filesystems should be careful about exactly what semantics they want and what
> they get when fiddling with gfp_t masks to allocate pagecache. One should be
> as liberal as possible with the type of memory that can be used, and same
> for the the context specific flags.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>

Looks good to me.

Reviewed-by: Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>

> ---
> Index: linux-2.6/mm/filemap.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.orig/mm/filemap.c
> +++ linux-2.6/mm/filemap.c
> @@ -741,7 +741,14 @@ repeat:
>  		page = __page_cache_alloc(gfp_mask);
>  		if (!page)
>  			return NULL;
> -		err = add_to_page_cache_lru(page, mapping, index, gfp_mask);
> +		/*
> +		 * We want a regular kernel memory (not highmem or DMA etc)
> +		 * allocation for the radix tree nodes, but we need to honour
> +		 * the context-specific requirements the caller has asked for.
> +		 * GFP_RECLAIM_MASK collects those requirements.
> +		 */
> +		err = add_to_page_cache_lru(page, mapping, index,
> +			(gfp_mask & GFP_RECLAIM_MASK));
>  		if (unlikely(err)) {
>  			page_cache_release(page);
>  			page = NULL;
> @@ -950,7 +957,7 @@ grab_cache_page_nowait(struct address_sp
>  		return NULL;
>  	}
>  	page = __page_cache_alloc(mapping_gfp_mask(mapping) & ~__GFP_FS);
> -	if (page && add_to_page_cache_lru(page, mapping, index, GFP_KERNEL)) {
> +	if (page && add_to_page_cache_lru(page, mapping, index, GFP_NOFS)) {
>  		page_cache_release(page);
>  		page = NULL;
>  	}

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2008-11-27 10:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-11-27  9:34 Nick Piggin
2008-11-27  9:35 ` [patch 2/2] fs: symlink write_begin allocation context fix Nick Piggin
2008-11-27 11:02   ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-11-27 11:14     ` Nick Piggin
2008-11-28 14:37     ` Nick Piggin
2008-11-29  6:35       ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-11-27  9:52 ` [patch 1/2] mm: pagecache allocation gfp fixes Pekka Enberg
2008-11-27 10:01   ` Nick Piggin
2008-11-27 10:18   ` Nick Piggin
2008-11-27 10:28     ` Pekka Enberg [this message]
2008-11-27 10:40       ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-11-27 18:14     ` Hugh Dickins
2008-11-28 12:04       ` Nick Piggin
2008-12-01  1:18         ` Hugh Dickins
2008-12-01  1:50           ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-12-01  7:39             ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1227781737.25160.3.camel@penberg-laptop \
    --to=penberg@cs.helsinki.fi \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=npiggin@suse.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox