linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Hansen <dave@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Nigel Cunningham <ncunningham@crca.org.au>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>,
	Matt Tolentino <matthew.e.tolentino@intel.com>,
	linux-pm@lists.osdl.org, Dave Hansen <haveblue@us.ibm.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, pavel@suse.cz,
	Mel Gorman <mel@skynet.ie>, Andy Whitcroft <apw@shadowen.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [linux-pm] [PATCH] hibernation should work ok with memory hotplug
Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2008 23:53:44 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1225785224.12673.564.camel@nimitz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1225783837.6755.33.camel@nigel-laptop>

On Tue, 2008-11-04 at 18:30 +1100, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
> One other question, if I may. Would you please explain (or point me to
> an explanation) of PHYS_PFN_OFFSET/ARCH_PFN_OFFSET? I've been dealing
> occasionally with people wanting to have hibernation on arm, and I don't
> really get the concept or the implementation (particularly when it comes
> to trying to do the sort of iterating over zones and pfns that was being
> discussed in previous messages in this thread.

First of all, I think PHYS_PFN_OFFSET is truly an arch-dependent
construct.  It only appears in arm an avr32.  I'll tell you only how
ARCH_PFN_OFFSET looks to me.  My guess is that those two arches need to
reconcile themselves and start using ARCH_PFN_OFFSET instead.

In the old days, we only had memory that started at physical address 0x0
and went up to some larger address.  We allocated a mem_map[] of 'struct
pages' in one big chunk, one for each address.  mem_map[0] was for
physical address 0x0 and mem_map[1] was for 0x1000, mem_map[2] was for
0x2000 and so on...

If a machine didn't have a physical address 0x0, we allocated mem_map[]
for it anyway and just wasted that entry.  What ARCH_PFN_OFFSET does is
let us bias the mem_map[] structure so that mem_map[0] does not
represent 0x0.

If ARCH_PFN_OFFSET is 1, then mem_map[0] actually represents the
physical address 0x1000.  If it is 2, then mem_map[0] represents
physical addr 0x2000.  ARCH_PFN_OFFSET means that the first physical
address on the machine is at ARCH_PFN_OFFSET*PAGE_SIZE.  We bias all
lookups into the mem_map[] so that we don't waste space in it.  There
will never be a zone_start_pfn lower than ARCH_PFN_OFFSET, for instance.

What does that mean for walking zones?  Nothing.  It only has meaning
for how we allocate and do lookups into the mem_map[].  But, since
everyone uses pfn_to_page() and friends, you don't ever see this.

I'm curious why you think you need to be concerned with it.

-- Dave

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2008-11-04  7:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20081029105956.GA16347@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz>
     [not found] ` <200810291325.01481.rjw@sisk.pl>
2008-11-03 20:51   ` Andrew Morton
2008-11-03 21:18     ` [linux-pm] " Nigel Cunningham
2008-11-03 21:21     ` Dave Hansen
2008-11-03 22:24       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-11-03 22:34         ` Dave Hansen
2008-11-03 23:05           ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-11-03 23:10             ` Dave Hansen
2008-11-04  0:29               ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-11-04  0:52                 ` Dave Hansen
2008-11-03 23:39           ` Andy Whitcroft
2008-11-04  4:02           ` [linux-pm] " Nigel Cunningham
2008-11-04  7:08             ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-11-04  7:36               ` Dave Hansen
2008-11-04  8:54                 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-11-04 15:21                   ` Dave Hansen
2008-11-04 15:35                     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-11-04 15:39                       ` Dave Hansen
2008-11-04 16:34                         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-11-04 16:59                           ` Dave Hansen
2008-11-05  0:38                             ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-11-05 11:08                               ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-11-06  0:14                                 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-11-06  0:28                                   ` Dave Hansen
2008-11-06  0:53                                     ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-11-06  2:03                                       ` Nigel Cunningham
2008-11-06  2:13                                         ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-11-06 14:47                                       ` Alan Stern
2008-11-07  1:09                                         ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-11-06  8:47                                     ` Pavel Machek
2008-11-06  1:17                                   ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-11-06  1:43                                     ` Nigel Cunningham
2008-11-06  1:54                                       ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-11-06  1:59                                         ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-11-06  2:00                                         ` Nigel Cunningham
2008-11-06  2:07                                           ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-11-06  3:12                                             ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-11-06  3:28                                               ` Yasunori Goto
2008-11-06  6:04                                                 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-11-06 14:48                                           ` Alan Stern
2008-11-06 20:46                                             ` Nigel Cunningham
2008-11-06  9:12                                     ` Pavel Machek
2008-11-06  9:12                                       ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-11-06  9:26                                         ` Nigel Cunningham
2008-11-06 14:43                                   ` Alan Stern
2008-11-04  7:09             ` Dave Hansen
2008-11-04  7:30               ` Nigel Cunningham
2008-11-04  7:53                 ` Dave Hansen [this message]
2008-11-05  9:10                   ` Nigel Cunningham
2008-11-05 10:58                     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-11-05 16:23                     ` Dave Hansen
2008-11-06 12:28     ` Pavel Machek

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1225785224.12673.564.camel@nimitz \
    --to=dave@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=apw@shadowen.org \
    --cc=haveblue@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@lists.osdl.org \
    --cc=matthew.e.tolentino@intel.com \
    --cc=mel@skynet.ie \
    --cc=ncunningham@crca.org.au \
    --cc=pavel@suse.cz \
    --cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox