From: Dave Hansen <dave@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Nigel Cunningham <ncunningham@crca.org.au>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>,
Matt Tolentino <matthew.e.tolentino@intel.com>,
linux-pm@lists.osdl.org, Dave Hansen <haveblue@us.ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, pavel@suse.cz,
Mel Gorman <mel@skynet.ie>, Andy Whitcroft <apw@shadowen.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [linux-pm] [PATCH] hibernation should work ok with memory hotplug
Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2008 23:53:44 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1225785224.12673.564.camel@nimitz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1225783837.6755.33.camel@nigel-laptop>
On Tue, 2008-11-04 at 18:30 +1100, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
> One other question, if I may. Would you please explain (or point me to
> an explanation) of PHYS_PFN_OFFSET/ARCH_PFN_OFFSET? I've been dealing
> occasionally with people wanting to have hibernation on arm, and I don't
> really get the concept or the implementation (particularly when it comes
> to trying to do the sort of iterating over zones and pfns that was being
> discussed in previous messages in this thread.
First of all, I think PHYS_PFN_OFFSET is truly an arch-dependent
construct. It only appears in arm an avr32. I'll tell you only how
ARCH_PFN_OFFSET looks to me. My guess is that those two arches need to
reconcile themselves and start using ARCH_PFN_OFFSET instead.
In the old days, we only had memory that started at physical address 0x0
and went up to some larger address. We allocated a mem_map[] of 'struct
pages' in one big chunk, one for each address. mem_map[0] was for
physical address 0x0 and mem_map[1] was for 0x1000, mem_map[2] was for
0x2000 and so on...
If a machine didn't have a physical address 0x0, we allocated mem_map[]
for it anyway and just wasted that entry. What ARCH_PFN_OFFSET does is
let us bias the mem_map[] structure so that mem_map[0] does not
represent 0x0.
If ARCH_PFN_OFFSET is 1, then mem_map[0] actually represents the
physical address 0x1000. If it is 2, then mem_map[0] represents
physical addr 0x2000. ARCH_PFN_OFFSET means that the first physical
address on the machine is at ARCH_PFN_OFFSET*PAGE_SIZE. We bias all
lookups into the mem_map[] so that we don't waste space in it. There
will never be a zone_start_pfn lower than ARCH_PFN_OFFSET, for instance.
What does that mean for walking zones? Nothing. It only has meaning
for how we allocate and do lookups into the mem_map[]. But, since
everyone uses pfn_to_page() and friends, you don't ever see this.
I'm curious why you think you need to be concerned with it.
-- Dave
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-11-04 7:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20081029105956.GA16347@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz>
[not found] ` <200810291325.01481.rjw@sisk.pl>
2008-11-03 20:51 ` Andrew Morton
2008-11-03 21:18 ` [linux-pm] " Nigel Cunningham
2008-11-03 21:21 ` Dave Hansen
2008-11-03 22:24 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-11-03 22:34 ` Dave Hansen
2008-11-03 23:05 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-11-03 23:10 ` Dave Hansen
2008-11-04 0:29 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-11-04 0:52 ` Dave Hansen
2008-11-03 23:39 ` Andy Whitcroft
2008-11-04 4:02 ` [linux-pm] " Nigel Cunningham
2008-11-04 7:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-11-04 7:36 ` Dave Hansen
2008-11-04 8:54 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-11-04 15:21 ` Dave Hansen
2008-11-04 15:35 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-11-04 15:39 ` Dave Hansen
2008-11-04 16:34 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-11-04 16:59 ` Dave Hansen
2008-11-05 0:38 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-11-05 11:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-11-06 0:14 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-11-06 0:28 ` Dave Hansen
2008-11-06 0:53 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-11-06 2:03 ` Nigel Cunningham
2008-11-06 2:13 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-11-06 14:47 ` Alan Stern
2008-11-07 1:09 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-11-06 8:47 ` Pavel Machek
2008-11-06 1:17 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-11-06 1:43 ` Nigel Cunningham
2008-11-06 1:54 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-11-06 1:59 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-11-06 2:00 ` Nigel Cunningham
2008-11-06 2:07 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-11-06 3:12 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-11-06 3:28 ` Yasunori Goto
2008-11-06 6:04 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-11-06 14:48 ` Alan Stern
2008-11-06 20:46 ` Nigel Cunningham
2008-11-06 9:12 ` Pavel Machek
2008-11-06 9:12 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-11-06 9:26 ` Nigel Cunningham
2008-11-06 14:43 ` Alan Stern
2008-11-04 7:09 ` Dave Hansen
2008-11-04 7:30 ` Nigel Cunningham
2008-11-04 7:53 ` Dave Hansen [this message]
2008-11-05 9:10 ` Nigel Cunningham
2008-11-05 10:58 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-11-05 16:23 ` Dave Hansen
2008-11-06 12:28 ` Pavel Machek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1225785224.12673.564.camel@nimitz \
--to=dave@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=apw@shadowen.org \
--cc=haveblue@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-pm@lists.osdl.org \
--cc=matthew.e.tolentino@intel.com \
--cc=mel@skynet.ie \
--cc=ncunningham@crca.org.au \
--cc=pavel@suse.cz \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox