From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, cl@linux-foundation.org,
tokunaga.keiich@jp.fujitsu.com, travis <travis@sgi.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 2/2] quicklist shouldn't be proportional to # of CPUs
Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2008 11:32:34 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1219311154.8651.96.camel@twins> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080821002757.b7c807ad.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
On Thu, 2008-08-21 at 00:27 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Thu, 21 Aug 2008 00:13:22 -0700 (PDT) David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> wrote:
>
> > From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
> > Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2008 23:46:15 -0700
> >
> > > On Wed, 20 Aug 2008 20:08:13 +0900 KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > + num_cpus_per_node = cpus_weight_nr(node_to_cpumask(node));
> > >
> > > sparc64 allmodconfig:
> > >
> > > mm/quicklist.c: In function `max_pages':
> > > mm/quicklist.c:44: error: invalid lvalue in unary `&'
> > >
> > > we seem to have a made a spectacular mess of cpumasks lately.
> >
> > It should explode similarly on x86, since it also defines node_to_cpumask()
> > as an inline function.
> >
> > IA64 seems to be one of the few platforms to define this as a macro
> > evaluating to the node-to-cpumask array entry, so it's clear what
> > platform Motohiro-san did build testing on :-)
>
> Seems to compile OK on x86_32, x86_64, ia64 and powerpc for some reason.
>
> This seems to fix things on sparc64:
>
> --- a/mm/quicklist.c~mm-quicklist-shouldnt-be-proportional-to-number-of-cpus-fix
> +++ a/mm/quicklist.c
> @@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ static unsigned long max_pages(unsigned
> unsigned long node_free_pages, max;
> int node = numa_node_id();
> struct zone *zones = NODE_DATA(node)->node_zones;
> - int num_cpus_per_node;
> + cpumask_t node_cpumask;
>
> node_free_pages =
> #ifdef CONFIG_ZONE_DMA
> @@ -41,8 +41,8 @@ static unsigned long max_pages(unsigned
>
> max = node_free_pages / FRACTION_OF_NODE_MEM;
>
> - num_cpus_per_node = cpus_weight_nr(node_to_cpumask(node));
> - max /= num_cpus_per_node;
> + node_cpumask = node_to_cpumask(node);
> + max /= cpus_weight_nr(node_cpumask);
>
> return max(max, min_pages);
> }
humm, I thought we wanted to keep cpumask_t stuff away from our stack -
since on insanely large SGI boxen (/me looks at mike) the thing becomes
512 bytes.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-08-21 9:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-08-20 11:05 [RFC][PATCH 0/2] Quicklist is slighly problematic KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-08-20 11:07 ` [RFC][PATCH 1/2] Show quicklist at meminfo KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-08-20 18:35 ` Andrew Morton
2008-08-21 7:36 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-08-22 1:05 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-08-22 4:28 ` Andrew Morton
2008-08-22 13:23 ` Robin Holt
2008-08-22 13:56 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-08-23 8:24 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-08-24 5:29 ` Andrew Morton
2008-08-20 11:08 ` [RFC][PATCH 2/2] quicklist shouldn't be proportional to # of CPUs KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-08-20 15:27 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-08-21 6:46 ` Andrew Morton
2008-08-21 7:13 ` David Miller, Andrew Morton
2008-08-21 7:18 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-08-21 7:27 ` Andrew Morton
2008-08-21 7:31 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-08-21 9:32 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2008-08-21 10:04 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-08-21 10:09 ` David Miller, KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-08-21 10:13 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-08-21 10:26 ` David Miller, KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-08-21 10:22 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-08-21 12:02 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-08-25 18:48 ` Mike Travis
2008-08-25 23:33 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-08-26 20:35 ` Mike Travis
2008-08-25 18:44 ` Mike Travis
2008-08-25 18:40 ` Mike Travis
2008-08-25 23:31 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-08-20 14:10 ` [RFC][PATCH 0/2] Quicklist is slighly problematic Christoph Lameter
2008-08-20 14:49 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-08-20 15:26 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-08-21 2:13 ` Robin Holt
2008-08-21 2:16 ` Robin Holt
2008-08-21 3:08 ` David Miller, Robin Holt
2008-08-21 13:10 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-08-20 18:31 ` Andrew Morton
2008-08-21 2:42 ` Robin Holt
2008-08-21 13:07 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-08-21 13:14 ` Robin Holt
2008-08-21 13:18 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-08-21 13:45 ` Robin Holt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1219311154.8651.96.camel@twins \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cl@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=tokunaga.keiich@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=travis@sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox