From: Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>
To: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, cl@linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH] SLUB: dynamic per-cache MIN_PARTIAL
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 15:33:53 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1218544433.7813.301.camel@penberg-laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080812122751.GY8618@parisc-linux.org>
Hi Matthew,
On Tue, Aug 05, 2008 at 12:39:36AM +0300, Pekka J Enberg wrote:
> > This patch changes the static MIN_PARTIAL to a dynamic per-cache ->min_partial
> > value that is calculated from object size. The bigger the object size, the more
> > pages we keep on the partial list.
> >
> > I tested SLAB, SLUB, and SLUB with this patch on Jens Axboe's 'netio' example
> > script of the fio benchmarking tool. The script stresses the networking
> > subsystem which should also give a fairly good beating of kmalloc() et al.
i>>?On Tue, 2008-08-12 at 06:27 -0600, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> We tested this patch and it was performance-neutral on TPC-C. I was
> hoping it would give a nice improvement ... so I'm disappointed. But at
> least there's no regression!
OK, so your regression is something else then. Well, thanks for testing!
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-08-12 12:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-08-04 21:39 Pekka J Enberg, Pekka Enberg
2008-08-04 21:43 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-08-12 12:27 ` Matthew Wilcox
2008-08-12 12:33 ` Pekka Enberg [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1218544433.7813.301.camel@penberg-laptop \
--to=penberg@cs.helsinki.fi \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cl@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=matthew@wil.cx \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox