From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from d01relay02.pok.ibm.com (d01relay02.pok.ibm.com [9.56.227.234]) by e1.ny.us.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m6UGTxXU008740 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 12:29:59 -0400 Received: from d01av03.pok.ibm.com (d01av03.pok.ibm.com [9.56.224.217]) by d01relay02.pok.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v9.0) with ESMTP id m6UGTxQx177826 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 12:29:59 -0400 Received: from d01av03.pok.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d01av03.pok.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id m6UGTv78013391 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 12:29:58 -0400 Subject: Re: sparcemem or discontig? From: Dave Hansen In-Reply-To: <4890957F.6080705@sciatl.com> References: <488F5D5F.9010006@sciatl.com> <1217368281.13228.72.camel@nimitz> <20080730093552.GD1369@brain> <4890957F.6080705@sciatl.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 09:29:53 -0700 Message-Id: <1217435393.18919.18.camel@nimitz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: C Michael Sundius Cc: Andy Whitcroft , linux-mm@kvack.org, msundius@sundius.com List-ID: On Wed, 2008-07-30 at 09:23 -0700, C Michael Sundius wrote: > Pardon my ignorance, but is sparcemem independent of the bootmem allocator? Yes, it really don't have much to do with bootmem. > We also use highmem. I noticed that all of our kmap and kmap_atomic code > is located > in the arch/mips directory. Is the sparcemem also independent of that? > should I expect > that I will have to make some changes in that... No, I don't think you'll need any changes to those. -- Dave -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org