linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>
To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no,
	Daniel Lezcano <dlezcano@fr.ibm.com>, Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>,
	cl@linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/30] mm: kmem_alloc_estimate()
Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 15:21:43 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1217420503.7813.170.camel@penberg-laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080724141529.716339226@chello.nl>

Hi Peter,

On Thu, 2008-07-24 at 16:00 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> plain text document attachment (mm-kmem_estimate_pages.patch)
> Provide a method to get the upper bound on the pages needed to allocate
> a given number of objects from a given kmem_cache.
> 
> This lays the foundation for a generic reserve framework as presented in
> a later patch in this series. This framework needs to convert object demand
> (kmalloc() bytes, kmem_cache_alloc() objects) to pages.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
> ---
>  include/linux/slab.h |    4 ++
>  mm/slab.c            |   75 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  mm/slub.c            |   87 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  3 files changed, 166 insertions(+)
> 
> Index: linux-2.6/include/linux/slab.h
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.orig/include/linux/slab.h
> +++ linux-2.6/include/linux/slab.h
> @@ -65,6 +65,8 @@ void kmem_cache_free(struct kmem_cache *
>  unsigned int kmem_cache_size(struct kmem_cache *);
>  const char *kmem_cache_name(struct kmem_cache *);
>  int kmem_ptr_validate(struct kmem_cache *cachep, const void *ptr);
> +unsigned kmem_alloc_estimate(struct kmem_cache *cachep,
> +			gfp_t flags, int objects);
>  
>  /*
>   * Please use this macro to create slab caches. Simply specify the
> @@ -99,6 +101,8 @@ int kmem_ptr_validate(struct kmem_cache 
>  void * __must_check krealloc(const void *, size_t, gfp_t);
>  void kfree(const void *);
>  size_t ksize(const void *);

Just a nitpick, but:

> +unsigned kmalloc_estimate_fixed(size_t, gfp_t, int);

kmalloc_estimate_objs()?

> +unsigned kmalloc_estimate_variable(gfp_t, size_t);

kmalloc_estimate_bytes()?

>  
>  /*
>   * Allocator specific definitions. These are mainly used to establish optimized
> Index: linux-2.6/mm/slub.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.orig/mm/slub.c
> +++ linux-2.6/mm/slub.c
> @@ -2412,6 +2412,42 @@ const char *kmem_cache_name(struct kmem_
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(kmem_cache_name);
>  
> +/*
> + * Calculate the upper bound of pages required to sequentially allocate
> + * @objects objects from @cachep.
> + *
> + * We should use s->min_objects because those are the least efficient.
> + */
> +unsigned kmem_alloc_estimate(struct kmem_cache *s, gfp_t flags, int objects)
> +{
> +	unsigned long pages;
> +	struct kmem_cache_order_objects x;
> +
> +	if (WARN_ON(!s) || WARN_ON(!oo_objects(s->min)))
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	x = s->min;
> +	pages = DIV_ROUND_UP(objects, oo_objects(x)) << oo_order(x);
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Account the possible additional overhead if the slab holds more that
> +	 * one object. Use s->max_objects because that's the worst case.
> +	 */
> +	x = s->oo;
> +	if (oo_objects(x) > 1) {

Hmm, I'm not sure why slab with just one object is treated separately
here. Surely you have per-CPU slabs then as well?

> +		/*
> +		 * Account the possible additional overhead if per cpu slabs
> +		 * are currently empty and have to be allocated. This is very
> +		 * unlikely but a possible scenario immediately after
> +		 * kmem_cache_shrink.
> +		 */
> +		pages += num_online_cpus() << oo_order(x);

Isn't this problematic with CPU hotplug? Shouldn't we use
num_possible_cpus() here?

> +	}
> +
> +	return pages;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kmem_alloc_estimate);
> +
>  static void list_slab_objects(struct kmem_cache *s, struct page *page,
>  							const char *text)
>  {
> @@ -2789,6 +2825,57 @@ void kfree(const void *x)
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(kfree);
>  
>  /*
> + * Calculate the upper bound of pages required to sequentially allocate
> + * @count objects of @size bytes from kmalloc given @flags.
> + */
> +unsigned kmalloc_estimate_fixed(size_t size, gfp_t flags, int count)
> +{
> +	struct kmem_cache *s = get_slab(size, flags);
> +	if (!s)
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	return kmem_alloc_estimate(s, flags, count);
> +
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kmalloc_estimate_fixed);
> +
> +/*
> + * Calculate the upper bound of pages requires to sequentially allocate @bytes
> + * from kmalloc in an unspecified number of allocations of nonuniform size.
> + */
> +unsigned kmalloc_estimate_variable(gfp_t flags, size_t bytes)
> +{
> +	int i;
> +	unsigned long pages;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * multiply by two, in order to account the worst case slack space
> +	 * due to the power-of-two allocation sizes.
> +	 */
> +	pages = DIV_ROUND_UP(2 * bytes, PAGE_SIZE);

For bytes > PAGE_SIZE this doesn't look right (for SLUB). We do page
allocator pass-through which means that we'll be grabbing high order
pages which can be bigger than what 'pages' is here.

> +
> +	/*
> +	 * add the kmem_cache overhead of each possible kmalloc cache
> +	 */
> +	for (i = 1; i < PAGE_SHIFT; i++) {
> +		struct kmem_cache *s;
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_ZONE_DMA
> +		if (unlikely(flags & SLUB_DMA))
> +			s = dma_kmalloc_cache(i, flags);
> +		else
> +#endif
> +			s = &kmalloc_caches[i];
> +
> +		if (s)
> +			pages += kmem_alloc_estimate(s, flags, 0);
> +	}
> +
> +	return pages;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kmalloc_estimate_variable);
> +
> +/*
>   * kmem_cache_shrink removes empty slabs from the partial lists and sorts
>   * the remaining slabs by the number of items in use. The slabs with the
>   * most items in use come first. New allocations will then fill those up
> Index: linux-2.6/mm/slab.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.orig/mm/slab.c
> +++ linux-2.6/mm/slab.c
> @@ -3854,6 +3854,81 @@ const char *kmem_cache_name(struct kmem_
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kmem_cache_name);
>  
>  /*
> + * Calculate the upper bound of pages required to sequentially allocate
> + * @objects objects from @cachep.
> + */
> +unsigned kmem_alloc_estimate(struct kmem_cache *cachep,
> +		gfp_t flags, int objects)
> +{
> +	/*
> +	 * (1) memory for objects,
> +	 */
> +	unsigned nr_slabs = DIV_ROUND_UP(objects, cachep->num);
> +	unsigned nr_pages = nr_slabs << cachep->gfporder;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * (2) memory for each per-cpu queue (nr_cpu_ids),
> +	 * (3) memory for each per-node alien queues (nr_cpu_ids), and
> +	 * (4) some amount of memory for the slab management structures
> +	 *
> +	 * XXX: truely account these

Heh, yes please. Or add a comment why it doesn't matter.

> +	 */
> +	nr_pages += 1 + ilog2(nr_pages);
> +
> +	return nr_pages;
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * Calculate the upper bound of pages required to sequentially allocate
> + * @count objects of @size bytes from kmalloc given @flags.
> + */
> +unsigned kmalloc_estimate_fixed(size_t size, gfp_t flags, int count)
> +{
> +	struct kmem_cache *s = kmem_find_general_cachep(size, flags);
> +	if (!s)
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	return kmem_alloc_estimate(s, flags, count);
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kmalloc_estimate_fixed);
> +
> +/*
> + * Calculate the upper bound of pages requires to sequentially allocate @bytes
> + * from kmalloc in an unspecified number of allocations of nonuniform size.
> + */
> +unsigned kmalloc_estimate_variable(gfp_t flags, size_t bytes)
> +{
> +	unsigned long pages;
> +	struct cache_sizes *csizep = malloc_sizes;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * multiply by two, in order to account the worst case slack space
> +	 * due to the power-of-two allocation sizes.
> +	 */
> +	pages = DIV_ROUND_UP(2 * bytes, PAGE_SIZE);
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * add the kmem_cache overhead of each possible kmalloc cache
> +	 */
> +	for (csizep = malloc_sizes; csizep->cs_cachep; csizep++) {
> +		struct kmem_cache *s;
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_ZONE_DMA
> +		if (unlikely(flags & __GFP_DMA))
> +			s = csizep->cs_dmacachep;
> +		else
> +#endif
> +			s = csizep->cs_cachep;
> +
> +		if (s)
> +			pages += kmem_alloc_estimate(s, flags, 0);
> +	}
> +
> +	return pages;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kmalloc_estimate_variable);
> +
> +/*
>   * This initializes kmem_list3 or resizes various caches for all nodes.
>   */
>  static int alloc_kmemlist(struct kmem_cache *cachep)
> 

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2008-07-30 12:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 74+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-07-24 14:00 [PATCH 00/30] Swap over NFS -v18 Peter Zijlstra
2008-07-24 14:00 ` [PATCH 01/30] swap over network documentation Peter Zijlstra, Neil Brown
2008-07-24 14:00 ` [PATCH 02/30] mm: gfp_to_alloc_flags() Peter Zijlstra
2008-08-12  5:01   ` Neil Brown
2008-08-12  7:33     ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-08-12  9:33       ` Neil Brown
2008-07-24 14:00 ` [PATCH 03/30] mm: tag reseve pages Peter Zijlstra
2008-07-24 14:00 ` [PATCH 04/30] mm: slub: trivial cleanups Peter Zijlstra
2008-07-28  9:43   ` Pekka Enberg
2008-07-28 10:19     ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-07-30 13:59       ` Christoph Lameter
2008-07-30 14:13         ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-07-29 22:15   ` Pekka Enberg
2008-07-24 14:00 ` [PATCH 05/30] mm: slb: add knowledge of reserve pages Peter Zijlstra
2008-08-12  5:35   ` Neil Brown
2008-08-12  7:22     ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-08-12  9:35       ` Neil Brown
2008-08-12 10:23         ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-07-24 14:00 ` [PATCH 06/30] mm: kmem_alloc_estimate() Peter Zijlstra
2008-07-30 12:21   ` Pekka Enberg [this message]
2008-07-30 13:31     ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-07-30 20:02       ` Christoph Lameter
2008-07-24 14:00 ` [PATCH 07/30] mm: allow PF_MEMALLOC from softirq context Peter Zijlstra
2008-07-24 14:00 ` [PATCH 08/30] mm: serialize access to min_free_kbytes Peter Zijlstra
2008-07-30 12:36   ` Pekka Enberg
2008-07-24 14:00 ` [PATCH 09/30] mm: emergency pool Peter Zijlstra
2008-07-24 14:00 ` [PATCH 10/30] mm: system wide ALLOC_NO_WATERMARK Peter Zijlstra
2008-07-24 14:00 ` [PATCH 11/30] mm: __GFP_MEMALLOC Peter Zijlstra
2008-07-25  9:29   ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-07-25  9:35     ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-07-25  9:39       ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-07-24 14:00 ` [PATCH 12/30] mm: memory reserve management Peter Zijlstra
2008-07-28 10:06   ` Pekka Enberg
2008-07-28 10:17     ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-07-28 10:29       ` Pekka Enberg
2008-07-28 10:39         ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-07-28 10:41           ` Pekka Enberg
2008-07-28 16:59           ` Matt Mackall
2008-07-28 17:13             ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-07-28 16:49     ` Matt Mackall
2008-07-28 17:13       ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-08-12  6:23   ` Neil Brown
2008-08-12  8:10     ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-08-12  7:46   ` Neil Brown
2008-08-12  8:12     ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-07-24 14:00 ` [PATCH 13/30] selinux: tag avc cache alloc as non-critical Peter Zijlstra
2008-07-24 14:00 ` [PATCH 14/30] net: wrap sk->sk_backlog_rcv() Peter Zijlstra
2008-07-24 14:00 ` [PATCH 15/30] net: packet split receive api Peter Zijlstra
2008-07-24 14:00 ` [PATCH 16/30] net: sk_allocation() - concentrate socket related allocations Peter Zijlstra
2008-07-24 14:00 ` [PATCH 17/30] netvm: network reserve infrastructure Peter Zijlstra
2008-07-24 14:01 ` [PATCH 18/30] netvm: INET reserves Peter Zijlstra
2008-10-01 11:38   ` Daniel Lezcano
2008-10-01 18:56     ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-07-24 14:01 ` [PATCH 19/30] netvm: hook skb allocation to reserves Peter Zijlstra
2008-07-24 14:01 ` [PATCH 20/30] netvm: filter emergency skbs Peter Zijlstra
2008-07-24 14:01 ` [PATCH 21/30] netvm: prevent a stream specific deadlock Peter Zijlstra
2008-07-24 14:01 ` [PATCH 22/30] netfilter: NF_QUEUE vs emergency skbs Peter Zijlstra
2008-07-24 14:01 ` [PATCH 23/30] netvm: skb processing Peter Zijlstra
2008-07-24 14:01 ` [PATCH 24/30] mm: add support for non block device backed swap files Peter Zijlstra
2008-07-24 14:01 ` [PATCH 25/30] mm: methods for teaching filesystems about PG_swapcache pages Peter Zijlstra
2008-07-24 14:01 ` [PATCH 26/30] nfs: remove mempools Peter Zijlstra
2008-07-24 14:46   ` Nick Piggin
2008-07-24 14:53     ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-07-24 14:01 ` [PATCH 27/30] nfs: teach the NFS client how to treat PG_swapcache pages Peter Zijlstra
2008-07-24 14:01 ` [PATCH 28/30] nfs: disable data cache revalidation for swapfiles Peter Zijlstra
2008-07-24 14:01 ` [PATCH 29/30] nfs: enable swap on NFS Peter Zijlstra
2008-07-24 14:01 ` [PATCH 30/30] nfs: fix various memory recursions possible with swap over NFS Peter Zijlstra
2008-07-25 10:46   ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-07-25 10:57     ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-07-25 11:15       ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-07-25 11:19         ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-09-30 12:41 ` [PATCH 00/30] Swap over NFS -v18 Peter Zijlstra
2008-09-30 15:46   ` Daniel Lezcano
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-03-20 20:10 [PATCH 00/30] Swap over NFS -v17 Peter Zijlstra
2008-03-20 20:10 ` [PATCH 06/30] mm: kmem_alloc_estimate() Peter Zijlstra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1217420503.7813.170.camel@penberg-laptop \
    --to=penberg@cs.helsinki.fi \
    --cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=cl@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=dlezcano@fr.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=neilb@suse.de \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox