linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@redhat.com>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, Dave Hansen <haveblue@us.ibm.com>,
	"Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@redhat.com>,
	Hideo AOKI <haoki@redhat.com>,
	Takashi Nishiie <t-nishiie@np.css.fujitsu.com>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Eduard - Gabriel Munteanu <eduard.munteanu@linux360.ro>
Subject: Re: [patch 09/17] LTTng instrumentation - filemap
Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2008 10:35:34 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1216197334.5232.24.camel@twins> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080715222748.002421557@polymtl.ca>

On Tue, 2008-07-15 at 18:26 -0400, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> plain text document attachment (lttng-instrumentation-filemap.patch)
> Instrumentation of waits caused by memory accesses on mmap regions.
> 
> Those tracepoints are used by LTTng.
> 
> About the performance impact of tracepoints (which is comparable to markers),
> even without immediate values optimizations, tests done by Hideo Aoki on ia64
> show no regression. His test case was using hackbench on a kernel where
> scheduler instrumentation (about 5 events in code scheduler code) was added.
> See the "Tracepoints" patch header for performance result detail.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca>
> CC: linux-mm@kvack.org
> CC: Dave Hansen <haveblue@us.ibm.com>
> CC: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@redhat.com>
> CC: 'Peter Zijlstra' <peterz@infradead.org>
> CC: "Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@redhat.com>
> CC: 'Ingo Molnar' <mingo@elte.hu>
> CC: 'Hideo AOKI' <haoki@redhat.com>
> CC: Takashi Nishiie <t-nishiie@np.css.fujitsu.com>
> CC: 'Steven Rostedt' <rostedt@goodmis.org>
> CC: Eduard - Gabriel Munteanu <eduard.munteanu@linux360.ro>
> ---
>  include/trace/filemap.h |   13 +++++++++++++
>  mm/filemap.c            |    3 +++
>  2 files changed, 16 insertions(+)
> 
> Index: linux-2.6-lttng/mm/filemap.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6-lttng.orig/mm/filemap.c	2008-07-15 14:51:50.000000000 -0400
> +++ linux-2.6-lttng/mm/filemap.c	2008-07-15 15:14:46.000000000 -0400
> @@ -33,6 +33,7 @@
>  #include <linux/cpuset.h>
>  #include <linux/hardirq.h> /* for BUG_ON(!in_atomic()) only */
>  #include <linux/memcontrol.h>
> +#include <trace/filemap.h>
>  #include "internal.h"
>  
>  /*
> @@ -541,9 +542,11 @@ void wait_on_page_bit(struct page *page,
>  {
>  	DEFINE_WAIT_BIT(wait, &page->flags, bit_nr);
>  
> +	trace_filemap_wait_start(page, bit_nr);
>  	if (test_bit(bit_nr, &page->flags))
>  		__wait_on_bit(page_waitqueue(page), &wait, sync_page,
>  							TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
> +	trace_filemap_wait_end(page, bit_nr);
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(wait_on_page_bit);

I don't like the trace_filemap_wait_* naming..

trace_wait_on_page_* might make more sense

> Index: linux-2.6-lttng/include/trace/filemap.h
> ===================================================================
> --- /dev/null	1970-01-01 00:00:00.000000000 +0000
> +++ linux-2.6-lttng/include/trace/filemap.h	2008-07-15 15:14:46.000000000 -0400
> @@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
> +#ifndef _TRACE_FILEMAP_H
> +#define _TRACE_FILEMAP_H
> +
> +#include <linux/tracepoint.h>
> +
> +DEFINE_TRACE(filemap_wait_start,
> +	TPPROTO(struct page *page, int bit_nr),
> +	TPARGS(page, bit_nr));
> +DEFINE_TRACE(filemap_wait_end,
> +	TPPROTO(struct page *page, int bit_nr),
> +	TPARGS(page, bit_nr));
> +
> +#endif
> 

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2008-07-16  8:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20080715222604.331269462@polymtl.ca>
2008-07-15 22:26 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-07-16  8:35   ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2008-07-16 14:37     ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-07-17  6:25   ` Nick Piggin
2008-07-17  7:02     ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-07-17  7:11       ` Nick Piggin
2008-07-15 22:26 ` [patch 10/17] LTTng instrumentation - swap Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-07-16  8:39   ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-07-16 14:40     ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-07-16 14:47       ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-07-16 15:00         ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-07-16 15:50           ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-07-16 16:17             ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-07-15 22:26 ` [patch 11/17] LTTng instrumentation - memory page faults Mathieu Desnoyers

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1216197334.5232.24.camel@twins \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=eduard.munteanu@linux360.ro \
    --cc=fche@redhat.com \
    --cc=haoki@redhat.com \
    --cc=haveblue@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca \
    --cc=mhiramat@redhat.com \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=t-nishiie@np.css.fujitsu.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox