From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@redhat.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, Dave Hansen <haveblue@us.ibm.com>,
"Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@redhat.com>,
Hideo AOKI <haoki@redhat.com>,
Takashi Nishiie <t-nishiie@np.css.fujitsu.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Eduard - Gabriel Munteanu <eduard.munteanu@linux360.ro>
Subject: Re: [patch 09/17] LTTng instrumentation - filemap
Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2008 10:35:34 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1216197334.5232.24.camel@twins> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080715222748.002421557@polymtl.ca>
On Tue, 2008-07-15 at 18:26 -0400, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> plain text document attachment (lttng-instrumentation-filemap.patch)
> Instrumentation of waits caused by memory accesses on mmap regions.
>
> Those tracepoints are used by LTTng.
>
> About the performance impact of tracepoints (which is comparable to markers),
> even without immediate values optimizations, tests done by Hideo Aoki on ia64
> show no regression. His test case was using hackbench on a kernel where
> scheduler instrumentation (about 5 events in code scheduler code) was added.
> See the "Tracepoints" patch header for performance result detail.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca>
> CC: linux-mm@kvack.org
> CC: Dave Hansen <haveblue@us.ibm.com>
> CC: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@redhat.com>
> CC: 'Peter Zijlstra' <peterz@infradead.org>
> CC: "Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@redhat.com>
> CC: 'Ingo Molnar' <mingo@elte.hu>
> CC: 'Hideo AOKI' <haoki@redhat.com>
> CC: Takashi Nishiie <t-nishiie@np.css.fujitsu.com>
> CC: 'Steven Rostedt' <rostedt@goodmis.org>
> CC: Eduard - Gabriel Munteanu <eduard.munteanu@linux360.ro>
> ---
> include/trace/filemap.h | 13 +++++++++++++
> mm/filemap.c | 3 +++
> 2 files changed, 16 insertions(+)
>
> Index: linux-2.6-lttng/mm/filemap.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6-lttng.orig/mm/filemap.c 2008-07-15 14:51:50.000000000 -0400
> +++ linux-2.6-lttng/mm/filemap.c 2008-07-15 15:14:46.000000000 -0400
> @@ -33,6 +33,7 @@
> #include <linux/cpuset.h>
> #include <linux/hardirq.h> /* for BUG_ON(!in_atomic()) only */
> #include <linux/memcontrol.h>
> +#include <trace/filemap.h>
> #include "internal.h"
>
> /*
> @@ -541,9 +542,11 @@ void wait_on_page_bit(struct page *page,
> {
> DEFINE_WAIT_BIT(wait, &page->flags, bit_nr);
>
> + trace_filemap_wait_start(page, bit_nr);
> if (test_bit(bit_nr, &page->flags))
> __wait_on_bit(page_waitqueue(page), &wait, sync_page,
> TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
> + trace_filemap_wait_end(page, bit_nr);
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(wait_on_page_bit);
I don't like the trace_filemap_wait_* naming..
trace_wait_on_page_* might make more sense
> Index: linux-2.6-lttng/include/trace/filemap.h
> ===================================================================
> --- /dev/null 1970-01-01 00:00:00.000000000 +0000
> +++ linux-2.6-lttng/include/trace/filemap.h 2008-07-15 15:14:46.000000000 -0400
> @@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
> +#ifndef _TRACE_FILEMAP_H
> +#define _TRACE_FILEMAP_H
> +
> +#include <linux/tracepoint.h>
> +
> +DEFINE_TRACE(filemap_wait_start,
> + TPPROTO(struct page *page, int bit_nr),
> + TPARGS(page, bit_nr));
> +DEFINE_TRACE(filemap_wait_end,
> + TPPROTO(struct page *page, int bit_nr),
> + TPARGS(page, bit_nr));
> +
> +#endif
>
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-07-16 8:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20080715222604.331269462@polymtl.ca>
2008-07-15 22:26 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-07-16 8:35 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2008-07-16 14:37 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-07-17 6:25 ` Nick Piggin
2008-07-17 7:02 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-07-17 7:11 ` Nick Piggin
2008-07-15 22:26 ` [patch 10/17] LTTng instrumentation - swap Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-07-16 8:39 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-07-16 14:40 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-07-16 14:47 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-07-16 15:00 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-07-16 15:50 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-07-16 16:17 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-07-15 22:26 ` [patch 11/17] LTTng instrumentation - memory page faults Mathieu Desnoyers
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1216197334.5232.24.camel@twins \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=eduard.munteanu@linux360.ro \
--cc=fche@redhat.com \
--cc=haoki@redhat.com \
--cc=haveblue@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca \
--cc=mhiramat@redhat.com \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=t-nishiie@np.css.fujitsu.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox