From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] putback_lru_page()/unevictable page handling rework v3 From: Lee Schermerhorn In-Reply-To: <20080624114006.D81C.KOSAKI.MOTOHIRO@jp.fujitsu.com> References: <20080621185408.E832.KOSAKI.MOTOHIRO@jp.fujitsu.com> <20080624114006.D81C.KOSAKI.MOTOHIRO@jp.fujitsu.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2008 13:10:53 -0400 Message-Id: <1214327453.6563.14.camel@lts-notebook> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: KOSAKI Motohiro Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki , linux-mm , LKML , Rik van Riel , Andrew Morton List-ID: On Tue, 2008-06-24 at 11:43 +0900, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote: > Hi > > > I merged kamezawa-san's SHMEM related fix. > > this patch works well >2H. > > and, I am going to test on stress workload during this week end. > > > > but I hope recieve review at first. > > thus I post it now. > > Unfortunately, my machine crashed last night ;-) > I'll dig it. I ran 26-rc5-mm3 with 5 split/unevictable lru patches that you posted on 19june. I replaced patch 5 of that series with the subject patch [rework v3, merged SHMEM fix]. This kernel ran my 'usex' stress load overnight for 23+ hours on both ia64 and x86_64 platforms with no problems. I evidently did not hit the problem you did. I'm rebuilding with a patch to a small problem that I discovered along with your recent patch to "prevent incorrect oom...". I'll let you know how that goes as well. I'll send along two additional patches shortly. Lee -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org