From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, davem@davemloft.net,
Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no>
Subject: Re: [patch] nfs: use GFP_NOFS preloads for radix-tree insertion
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2007 10:06:27 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1195031187.6924.1.camel@twins> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20071114042011.GE557@wotan.suse.de>
On Wed, 2007-11-14 at 05:20 +0100, Nick Piggin wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 11:55:45AM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 2007-11-08 at 07:56 +0100, Nick Piggin wrote:
> > > Here is the NFS version. I guess Trond should ack it before you pick it
> > > up.
> > >
> > > --
> > >
> > > NFS should use GFP_NOFS mode radix tree preloads rather than GFP_ATOMIC
> > > allocations at radix-tree insertion-time. This is important to reduce the
> > > atomic memory requirement.
> >
> > In another mail you said:
> >
> > > Anyway we can also simplify the code because the insertion can't fail with a
> > > preload.
> >
> > Can we please avoid adding strict dependencies on that as the preload
> > API is unsupportable in -rt.
>
> You can surely support it. You just have to do per-thread preloads if you
> want preemption left on.
Well, true, but that would mean adding stuff to task_struct, not the end
of the world I guess.
But as it is leaving the error handling on each individual
radix_tree_insert() allows us to just use GFP_KERNEL for everything.
The other, nicer option, is to do preload on the radix_tree_context
object instead.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-11-14 9:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-11-08 0:43 [patch] radix-tree: avoid atomic allocations for preloaded insertions Nick Piggin
2007-11-08 1:09 ` Andrew Morton
2007-11-08 1:34 ` David Miller, Andrew Morton
2007-11-08 1:41 ` Andrew Morton
2007-11-08 1:45 ` David Miller, Andrew Morton
2007-11-08 1:37 ` Nick Piggin
2007-11-08 3:02 ` Andrew Morton
2007-11-08 3:16 ` Nick Piggin
2007-11-08 4:12 ` Andrew Morton
2007-11-08 4:54 ` Nick Piggin
2007-11-08 5:02 ` Andrew Morton
2007-11-08 5:44 ` Nick Piggin
2007-11-08 6:02 ` Andrew Morton
2007-11-08 6:54 ` Nick Piggin
2007-11-08 6:56 ` [patch] nfs: use GFP_NOFS preloads for radix-tree insertion Nick Piggin
2007-11-13 10:55 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-11-14 4:20 ` Nick Piggin
2007-11-14 9:06 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2007-11-14 15:39 ` Nick Piggin
2007-11-08 11:57 ` [patch] radix-tree: avoid atomic allocations for preloaded insertions Peter Zijlstra
2007-11-08 20:37 ` Nick Piggin
2007-11-08 20:47 ` Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1195031187.6924.1.camel@twins \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=npiggin@suse.de \
--cc=trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox