From: Badari Pulavarty <pbadari@us.ibm.com>
To: Geoff Levand <geoffrey.levand@am.sony.com>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
anton@au1.ibm.com,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] PPC64 Exporting memory information through /proc/iomem
Date: Tue, 02 Oct 2007 13:37:15 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1191357435.6106.31.camel@dyn9047017100.beaverton.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4702A5FE.5000308@am.sony.com>
On Tue, 2007-10-02 at 13:11 -0700, Geoff Levand wrote:
> Hi Badari,
>
> Badari Pulavarty wrote:
> > Hi Paul & Ben,
> >
> > I am trying to get hotplug memory remove working on ppc64.
> > In order to verify a given memory region, if its valid or not -
> > current hotplug-memory patches used /proc/iomem. On IA64 and
> > x86-64 /proc/iomem shows all memory regions.
> >
> > I am wondering, if its acceptable to do the same on ppc64 also ?
> > Otherwise, we need to add arch-specific hooks in hotplug-remove
> > code to be able to do this.
>
>
> It seems the only reasonable place is in /proc/iomem, as the the
> generic memory hotplug routines put it in there, and if you have
> a ppc64 system that uses add_memory() you will have mem info in
> several places, none of which are complete.
Well, this information exists in various places (lmb structures
in the kernel), /proc/device-tree for various users. I want to
find out what ppc experts think about making this available through
/proc/iomem also since generic memory hotplug routines expect
it there.
Other option would be to provide arch-specific call out. Each
arch could decide to implement whatever way they want to verify
the range.
Thanks,
Badari
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-10-02 20:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-10-02 17:29 Badari Pulavarty
2007-10-02 20:11 ` Geoff Levand
2007-10-02 20:37 ` Badari Pulavarty [this message]
2007-10-02 20:50 ` Geoff Levand
2007-10-02 22:56 ` Paul Mackerras
2007-10-02 23:10 ` Badari Pulavarty
2007-10-03 1:19 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2007-10-03 15:35 ` Badari Pulavarty
2007-10-03 16:25 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2007-10-03 16:40 ` Badari Pulavarty
2007-10-30 19:19 ` [RFC] hotplug memory remove - walk_memory_resource for ppc64 Badari Pulavarty
2007-10-31 5:28 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2007-10-31 5:34 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2007-10-31 16:02 ` Badari Pulavarty
2007-10-31 15:46 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2007-10-31 16:48 ` [PATCH 0/3] hotplug memory remove support for PPC64 Badari Pulavarty
2007-10-31 16:10 ` [RFC] hotplug memory remove - walk_memory_resource for ppc64 Badari Pulavarty
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1191357435.6106.31.camel@dyn9047017100.beaverton.ibm.com \
--to=pbadari@us.ibm.com \
--cc=anton@au1.ibm.com \
--cc=geoffrey.levand@am.sony.com \
--cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox