linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
To: Vasilis Liaskovitis <vasilis.liaskovitis@profitbricks.com>
Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com,
	wency@cn.fujitsu.com, lenb@kernel.org, toshi.kani@hp.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 0/3] acpi: Introduce prepare_remove device operation
Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2012 22:17:17 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <11897248.2VNutIHaJi@vostro.rjw.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1352974970-6643-1-git-send-email-vasilis.liaskovitis@profitbricks.com>

On Thursday, November 15, 2012 11:22:47 AM Vasilis Liaskovitis wrote:
> As discussed in https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/1581581/
> the driver core remove function needs to always succeed. This means we need
> to know that the device can be successfully removed before acpi_bus_trim / 
> acpi_bus_hot_remove_device are called. This can cause panics when OSPM-initiated
> eject or driver unbind of memory devices fails e.g with:
> 
> echo 1 >/sys/bus/pci/devices/PNP0C80:XX/eject
> echo "PNP0C80:XX" > /sys/bus/acpi/drivers/acpi_memhotplug/unbind
> 
> since the ACPI core goes ahead and ejects the device regardless of whether the
> the memory is still in use or not.
> 
> For this reason a new acpi_device operation called prepare_remove is introduced.
> This operation should be registered for acpi devices whose removal (from kernel
> perspective) can fail.  Memory devices fall in this category.
> A similar operation is introduced in bus_type to safely handle driver unbind
> from the device driver core.
> 
> acpi_bus_hot_remove_device and driver_unbind are changed to handle removal in 2
> steps:
> - preparation for removal i.e. perform part of removal that can fail. Should
>   succeed for device and all its children.
> - if above step was successfull, proceed to actual device removal
> 
> With this patchset, only acpi memory devices use the new prepare_remove
> device operation. The actual memory removal (VM-related offline and other memory
> cleanups) is moved to prepare_remove. The old remove operation just cleans up
> the acpi structures. Directly ejecting PNP0C80 memory devices works safely. I
> haven't tested yet with an ACPI container which contains memory devices.
> 
> v1->v2:
> - new patch to introduce bus_type prepare_remove callback. Needed to prepare
> removal on driver unbinding from device-driver core.
> - v1 patches 1 and 2 simplified and merged in one. acpi_bus_trim does not require
> argument changes.
> 
> Comments welcome.
> 
> Vasilis Liaskovitis (3):
>   driver core: Introduce prepare_remove in bus_type
>   acpi: Introduce prepare_remove operation in acpi_device_ops
>   acpi_memhotplug: Add prepare_remove operation
> 
>  drivers/acpi/acpi_memhotplug.c |   22 ++++++++++++++++++++--
>  drivers/acpi/scan.c            |   21 ++++++++++++++++++++-
>  drivers/base/bus.c             |   36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  include/acpi/acpi_bus.h        |    2 ++
>  include/linux/device.h         |    2 ++
>  5 files changed, 80 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

CCs of all driver core patches have to go to Greg Kroah-Hartman.

Thanks,
Rafael


-- 
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-11-16 21:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-11-15 10:22 Vasilis Liaskovitis
2012-11-15 10:22 ` [RFC PATCH v2 1/3] driver core: Introduce prepare_remove in bus_type Vasilis Liaskovitis
2012-11-15 10:22 ` [RFC PATCH v2 2/3] acpi: Introduce prepare_remove operation in acpi_device_ops Vasilis Liaskovitis
2012-11-15 10:22 ` [RFC PATCH v2 3/3] acpi_memhotplug: Add prepare_remove operation Vasilis Liaskovitis
2012-11-16 21:17 ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2012-11-16 21:33   ` [RFC PATCH v2 0/3] acpi: Introduce prepare_remove device operation Greg Kroah-Hartman
2012-11-16 21:41     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-11-16 21:43 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-11-16 22:45   ` Toshi Kani
2012-11-16 23:01     ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2012-11-16 23:14       ` Toshi Kani
2012-11-16 23:33         ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2012-11-16 23:35           ` Toshi Kani
2012-11-17  0:02             ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2012-11-17  0:08               ` Toshi Kani
2012-11-17  0:22                 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2012-11-17  0:25                   ` Toshi Kani
2012-11-18 16:16                     ` Jiang Liu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=11897248.2VNutIHaJi@vostro.rjw.lan \
    --to=rjw@sisk.pl \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=lenb@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=toshi.kani@hp.com \
    --cc=vasilis.liaskovitis@profitbricks.com \
    --cc=wency@cn.fujitsu.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox