From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Subject: Re: cpusets vs. mempolicy and how to get interleaving From: Lee Schermerhorn In-Reply-To: References: <46C63BDE.20602@google.com> <46C63D5D.3020107@google.com> <46C8E604.8040101@google.com> <20070819193431.dce5d4cf.pj@sgi.com> <46C92AF4.20607@google.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 10:14:55 -0400 Message-Id: <1187705695.5066.8.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Christoph Lameter Cc: Paul Jackson , Ethan Solomita , rientjes@google.com, linux-mm@kvack.org, Eric Whitney List-ID: On Mon, 2007-08-20 at 12:07 -0700, Christoph Lameter wrote: > On Sun, 19 Aug 2007, Ethan Solomita wrote: > > > OK, then I'll proceed with a new MPOL. Do you believe that this will > > be of general interest? i.e. worth placing in linux-mm? > > Ummmm... Lets first get Lee onto this. AFAIK he already has an > implementation for such a thing. > > Lee: Would you respond to these emails? > Here's the post for cpuset-independent interleave [a.k.a. "contextual interleave"]. http://marc.info/?l=linux-mm&m=118608528417158&w=4 I'm maintaining this with a half a dozen other mempolicy cleanups and enhancements. I'll try to post the entire series later this week. Meanwhile, the patch linked above should apply to current mm tree with little conflict. Lee -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org