linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
To: Matthew Hawkins <darthmdh@gmail.com>
Cc: Roland Dreier <rdreier@cisco.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	Jacob Braun <jwbraun@gmail.com>, kriko <kristjan.ugrin@gmail.com>,
	ck@vds.kolivas.org,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [ck] Re: SD still better than CFS for 3d ?
Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 09:01:48 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1185865308.4561.8.camel@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b21f8390707302007n2f21018crc6b7cd83666e0f3c@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, 2007-07-31 at 13:07 +1000, Matthew Hawkins wrote:
> On 7/31/07, Roland Dreier <rdreier@cisco.com> wrote:
> >  >      Fuck you Martin!
> >
> > I think you meant to yell at Matthew, not Martin ;)
> 
> What's amusing about this is he's yelling at me for something I didn't
> do, can't even get my name right, and has the audacity to claim that
> *I* am the one looking like a fool!  While we're descending into
> primary school theatrics, may I just say "takes one to know one" ;-)

Pouring oil into the fire ?

> I took the time to track down what caused a breakage - in an "illegal
> binary driver" (not against the law here, though defamation certainly
> is...) no less.  And contacted the vendor (separately).  Other people
> on desktop machines with an ATI card using the fglrx driver may have
> been interested to know that they can't do the benchmarking some
> people here on lkml and -mm are asking for with a current 2.6.23 git
> kernel, hence my post.

To inform the vendor and to post a warning about the issue on lkml was
the right thing to do. It is the wording of your post that obviously
irked some people.

> Martin's cleanup patch is good and I never claimed otherwise, I just
> said the comment on the commit was a bad call (as there are users of
> that interface).  Certainly ATI should fix their dodgy drivers.
> That's been the cry of the community for a long time...

The commit message could have been better. The correct thing to say
would have been "Nobody in the official kernel is using
ptep_test_and_clear_dirty and ptep_clear_flush_dirty."
nvidia will have to adapt their binary driver. This is not the first
time it breaks and it won't be the last time. We do not really have a
problem and we should all calm down and put that issue to rest.

-- 
blue skies,
  Martin.

"Reality continues to ruin my life." - Calvin.


--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2007-07-31  6:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <alpine.LFD.0.999.0707221351030.3607@woody.linux-foundation.org>
     [not found] ` <1185536610.502.8.camel@localhost>
     [not found]   ` <20070729170641.GA26220@elte.hu>
     [not found]     ` <930f95dc0707291154j102494d9m58f4cc452c7ff17c@mail.gmail.com>
     [not found]       ` <20070729204716.GB1578@elte.hu>
     [not found]         ` <930f95dc0707291431j4e50214di3c01cd44b5597502@mail.gmail.com>
     [not found]           ` <20070730114649.GB19186@elte.hu>
     [not found]             ` <op.tv90xghwatcbto@linux.site>
     [not found]               ` <d3380cee0707300831m33d896aufcbdb188576940a2@mail.gmail.com>
2007-07-30 16:25                 ` [ck] Re: SD still better than CFS for 3d ?(was Re: 2.6.23-rc1) Matthew Hawkins
2007-07-30 16:50                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-07-30 17:09                     ` Kyle Rose
2007-07-30 16:50                   ` Martin Schwidefsky
2007-07-30 16:58                     ` Rashkae
2007-07-30 17:51                   ` Arjan van de Ven
2007-07-30 18:29                   ` Christoph Hellwig
2007-07-30 19:53                     ` [ck] Re: SD still better than CFS for 3d ? Roland Dreier
2007-07-30 21:26                       ` Christoph Hellwig
2007-07-31  3:07                       ` Matthew Hawkins
2007-07-31  7:01                         ` Martin Schwidefsky [this message]
2007-07-31 12:13                         ` Christoph Hellwig
2007-08-01  5:25                         ` Adrian Bunk
2007-08-01  6:19                           ` Matthew Hawkins
2007-08-01  7:50                             ` Adrian Bunk

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1185865308.4561.8.camel@localhost \
    --to=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=ck@vds.kolivas.org \
    --cc=darthmdh@gmail.com \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=jwbraun@gmail.com \
    --cc=kristjan.ugrin@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=rdreier@cisco.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox