linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@hp.com>
To: Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Ravikiran G Thirumalai <kiran@scalex86.org>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org,
	Christoph Lameter <clameter@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com>,
	shai@scalex86.org
Subject: Re: [rfc] [patch] mm: zone_reclaim fix for pseudo file systems
Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 17:12:40 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1185829960.5492.94.camel@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0707301331050.17543@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com>

On Mon, 2007-07-30 at 13:31 -0700, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Mon, 30 Jul 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:
> 
> > It is a numa-specific change which adds overhead to non-NUMA builds :(
> 
> It could be generalized to fix the other issues that we have with 
> unreclaimable pages.
> 

For example, see the following patches that I posted in response to a
discussion between Andrew, Rik van Riel and Andrea Arcangeli to
resounding silence [for which, perhaps, I should be grateful?]: 

http://marc.info/?l=linux-mm&m=118315682007044&w=4
http://marc.info/?l=linux-mm&m=118315703313729&w=4
http://marc.info/?l=linux-mm&m=118315713323641&w=4
http://marc.info/?l=linux-mm&m=118315742025334&w=4

[By the way:  I have another experimental patch in this series that uses
Rik's page_anon() function from his "split LRU lists" patch to detect
swap backed pages and push them to the "no reclaim list" when no swap
space is available.]

I haven't thought about it much, but perhaps my "page_reclaimable()"
function could be taught to exclude RAMFS pages as well?

Later,
Lee

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2007-07-30 21:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-07-27 23:27 Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2007-07-30 18:12 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-07-30 20:23 ` Andrew Morton
2007-07-30 20:31   ` Christoph Lameter
2007-07-30 21:12     ` Lee Schermerhorn [this message]
2007-07-31  0:01   ` Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2007-07-31  0:20     ` Andrew Morton
2007-07-31  0:27       ` Christoph Lameter
2007-07-31  1:06         ` Andrew Morton
2007-07-31  1:52           ` Christoph Lameter
2007-07-31  1:56         ` Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2007-07-31  2:01           ` Christoph Lameter
2007-07-31  2:27             ` Andrew Morton
2007-07-31  2:36               ` Christoph Lameter
2007-07-31  4:47                 ` Andrew Morton
2007-07-31  5:00                   ` Christoph Lameter
2007-07-31  5:17                     ` Andrew Morton
2007-07-31  5:33                       ` Christoph Lameter
2007-07-31  5:58                         ` Andrew Morton
2007-07-31  6:09                           ` Christoph Lameter
2007-07-31  6:18                             ` Andrew Morton
2007-07-31 19:35                               ` Christoph Lameter
2007-07-31 19:46                                 ` Andrew Morton
2007-07-31 19:50                                   ` Christoph Lameter
2007-07-31  8:27                           ` Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2007-07-31  8:35                             ` Andrew Morton
2007-07-31 19:30                               ` Christoph Lameter
2007-07-31 19:20                             ` Christoph Lameter
2007-07-31  7:15                     ` Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2007-07-31 19:18                       ` Christoph Lameter
2007-07-31  1:36       ` Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2007-07-31  1:53         ` Andrew Morton
2007-07-31  1:56           ` Christoph Lameter
2007-07-31  2:19 ` Christoph Lameter

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1185829960.5492.94.camel@localhost \
    --to=lee.schermerhorn@hp.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=clameter@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com \
    --cc=clameter@sgi.com \
    --cc=kiran@scalex86.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=shai@scalex86.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox