From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Subject: Re: [ck] Re: SD still better than CFS for 3d ?(was Re: 2.6.23-rc1) From: Peter Zijlstra In-Reply-To: References: <1185536610.502.8.camel@localhost> <20070729170641.GA26220@elte.hu> <930f95dc0707291154j102494d9m58f4cc452c7ff17c@mail.gmail.com> <20070729204716.GB1578@elte.hu> <930f95dc0707291431j4e50214di3c01cd44b5597502@mail.gmail.com> <20070730114649.GB19186@elte.hu> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 18:50:28 +0200 Message-Id: <1185814234.16771.1.camel@lappy> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Matthew Hawkins Cc: Jacob Braun , kriko , ck@vds.kolivas.org, Linux Kernel Mailing List , linux-mm@kvack.org, Martin Schwidefsky List-ID: On Tue, 2007-07-31 at 02:25 +1000, Matthew Hawkins wrote: > On 7/31/07, Jacob Braun wrote: > > On 7/30/07, kriko wrote: > > > I would try the new cfs how it performs, but it seems that nvidia drivers > > > doesn't compile successfully under 2.6.23-rc1. > > > http://files.myopera.com/kriko/files/nvidia-installer.log > > > > > > If someone has the solution, please share. > > > > There is a patch for the nvidia drivers here: > > http://bugs.gentoo.org/attachment.cgi?id=125959 > > The ATI drivers (current 8.39.4) were broken by > commit e21ea246bce5bb93dd822de420172ec280aed492 > Author: Martin Schwidefsky > > Bad call on the "nobody was using these", Martin :( Nobody in the upstream kernel did, and that is what matters. If you care about your kernel code get it upstream. As for breaking binary crap, thats a bonus. Break them hard, break them often. Kudos to Martin. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org