From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Subject: Re: [PATCH take3] Memoryless nodes: use "node_memory_map" for cpuset mems_allowed validation From: Lee Schermerhorn In-Reply-To: <20070725220023.GK18510@us.ibm.com> References: <20070711182219.234782227@sgi.com> <20070711182250.005856256@sgi.com> <1185309019.5649.69.camel@localhost> <20070725220023.GK18510@us.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 09:04:30 -0400 Message-Id: <1185455070.5070.8.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Nishanth Aravamudan Cc: Christoph Lameter , Paul Jackson , akpm@linux-foundation.org, kxr@sgi.com, linux-mm@kvack.org, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki List-ID: On Wed, 2007-07-25 at 15:00 -0700, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote: > On 24.07.2007 [16:30:19 -0400], Lee Schermerhorn wrote: > > Memoryless Nodes: use "node_memory_map" for cpusets - take 3 > > > > Against 2.6.22-rc6-mm1 atop Christoph Lameter's memoryless nodes > > series > > > > take 2: > > + replaced node_online_map in cpuset_current_mems_allowed() > > with node_states[N_MEMORY] > > + replaced node_online_map in cpuset_init_smp() with > > node_states[N_MEMORY] > > > > take 3: > > + fix up comments and top level cpuset tracking of nodes > > with memory [instead of on-line nodes]. > > + maybe I got them all this time? > > My ack stands, but I believe Documentation/cpusets.txt will need > updating too :) When [he says hopefully] I get the patches memoryless patches tested on 23-rc1-mm1, I'll include a documentation update patch. Lee -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org