From: Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@hp.com>
To: Nish Aravamudan <nish.aravamudan@gmail.com>
Cc: Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>, Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>,
Adam Litke <agl@us.ibm.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, mel@skynet.ie, apw@shadowen.org,
wli@holomorphy.com, clameter@sgi.com, kenchen@google.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] [hugetlb] Try to grow pool for MAP_SHARED mappings
Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2007 16:53:58 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1184964838.9651.70.camel@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <29495f1d0707201335u5fbc9565o2a53a18e45d8b28@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, 2007-07-20 at 13:35 -0700, Nish Aravamudan wrote:
> On 7/18/07, Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org> wrote:
<snip>
> > It would be quite nice to have some way to have nodes opt-in to the sort
> > of behaviour they're willing to tolerate. Some nodes are never going to
> > tolerate spreading of any sort, hugepages, and so forth. Perhaps it makes
> > more sense to have some flags in the pgdat where we can more strongly
> > type the sort of behaviour the node is willing to put up with (or capable
> > of supporting), at least in this case the nodes that explicitly can't
> > cope are factored out before we even get to cpuset constraints (plus this
> > gives us a hook for setting up the interleave nodes in both the system
> > init and default policies). Thoughts?
>
> I guess I don't understand which nodes you're talking about now? How
> do you spread across any particular single node (how I read "Some
> nodes are never going to tolerate spreading of any sort")? Or do you
> mean that some cpusets aren't going to want to spread (interleave?).
>
> Oh, are you trying to say that some nodes should be dropped from
> interleave masks (explicitly excluded from all possible interleave
> masks)? What kind of nodes would these be? We're doing something
> similar to deal with memoryless nodes, perhaps it could be
> generalized?
If that's what Paul means [and I think it is, based on a converstation
at OLS], I have a similar requirement. I'd like to be able to specify,
on the command line, at least [run time reconfig not a hard requirement]
nodes to be excluded from interleave masks, including the hugetlb
allocation mask [if this is different from the regular interleaving
nodemask].
And, I agree, I think we can add another node_states[] entry or two to
hold these nodes. I'll try to work up a patch next week if noone beats
me to it.
Lee
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-07-20 20:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-07-13 15:16 [PATCH 0/5] [RFC] Dynamic hugetlb pool resizing Adam Litke
2007-07-13 15:16 ` [PATCH 1/5] [hugetlb] Introduce BASE_PAGES_PER_HPAGE constant Adam Litke
2007-07-23 19:43 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-07-23 19:52 ` Adam Litke
2007-07-13 15:16 ` [PATCH 2/5] [hugetlb] Account for hugepages as locked_vm Adam Litke
2007-07-13 15:16 ` [PATCH 3/5] [hugetlb] Move update_and_free_page so it can be used by alloc functions Adam Litke
2007-07-13 15:17 ` [PATCH 4/5] [hugetlb] Try to grow pool on alloc_huge_page failure Adam Litke
2007-07-13 15:17 ` [PATCH 5/5] [hugetlb] Try to grow pool for MAP_SHARED mappings Adam Litke
2007-07-13 20:05 ` Paul Jackson
2007-07-13 21:05 ` Adam Litke
2007-07-13 21:24 ` Ken Chen
2007-07-13 21:29 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-07-13 21:38 ` Ken Chen
2007-07-13 21:47 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-07-13 22:21 ` Paul Jackson
2007-07-13 21:38 ` Paul Jackson
2007-07-17 23:42 ` Nish Aravamudan
2007-07-18 14:44 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2007-07-18 15:17 ` Nish Aravamudan
2007-07-18 16:02 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2007-07-18 21:16 ` Nish Aravamudan
2007-07-18 21:40 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2007-07-19 1:52 ` Paul Mundt
2007-07-20 20:35 ` Nish Aravamudan
2007-07-20 20:53 ` Lee Schermerhorn [this message]
2007-07-20 21:12 ` Nish Aravamudan
2007-07-21 16:57 ` Paul Mundt
2007-07-13 23:15 ` Nish Aravamudan
2007-07-13 21:09 ` Ken Chen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1184964838.9651.70.camel@localhost \
--to=lee.schermerhorn@hp.com \
--cc=agl@us.ibm.com \
--cc=apw@shadowen.org \
--cc=clameter@sgi.com \
--cc=kenchen@google.com \
--cc=lethal@linux-sh.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mel@skynet.ie \
--cc=nish.aravamudan@gmail.com \
--cc=pj@sgi.com \
--cc=wli@holomorphy.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox