linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
To: linux-mm@kvack.org
Cc: Linux Kernel list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: removing flush_tlb_mm as a generic hook ?
Date: Mon, 09 Jul 2007 13:47:54 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1183952874.3388.349.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)

Hi folks !

While toying around with various MM callbacks, I found out that
flush_tlb_mm() as a generic hook provided by the archs has been mostly
obsoleted by the mmu_gather stuff.

(I'm not talking about archs internally wanting to implement it and use
it as a tlb_flush(), I'm talking about possibly making that optional :-)

I see two remaining users:

 - fs/proc/task_mmu.c, which I easily converted to use the mmu_gather
(I'll send a patch if people agree it's worth doing)

 - kernel/fork.c uses it to flush the "old" mm. That's the "meat".

I wonder if it's worth pursuing, that is converting copy_page_range to
use an mmu_gather on the source instead of using flush_tlb_mm. It might
allow some archs that can't just "flush all" easily but have to go
through every PTE individually to improve things a bit on fork, and it
allow them to remove the flush_tlb_mm() logic.

There is one reason why it's not a trivial conversion though, is that
copy_page_range() calls copy_hugetlb_page_range() for huge pages, and
I'm not sure about mixing up the hugetlb stuff with the mmu_gather
stuff, I need to do a bit more code auditing to figure out whether
that's an ok thing to do.

Nothing very urgent or important, it's just that one less hook seems
like a good idea ;-)

Cheers,
Ben.


--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

             reply	other threads:[~2007-07-09  3:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-07-09  3:47 Benjamin Herrenschmidt [this message]
2007-07-09  6:36 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-07-09  6:45   ` [RFC/PATCH] Use mmu_gather for fork() instead of flush_tlb_mm() Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-07-09  7:39     ` Nick Piggin
2007-07-09  9:12       ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-07-09  9:29         ` Nick Piggin
2007-07-09  9:47           ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-07-09 10:12             ` Nick Piggin
2007-07-09 10:18               ` Nick Piggin
2007-07-09 12:37                 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-07-09 12:32               ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-07-09  6:46   ` [RFC/PATCH] Use mmu_gather for /proc stuff " Benjamin Herrenschmidt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1183952874.3388.349.camel@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox