From: Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@hp.com>
To: clameter@sgi.com
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [patch 07/10] Memoryless nodes: SLUB support
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2007 10:10:11 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1182348612.5058.3.camel@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070618192545.764710140@sgi.com>
On Mon, 2007-06-18 at 12:20 -0700, clameter@sgi.com wrote:
> plain text document attachment (memless_slub)
> Simply switch all for_each_online_node to for_each_memory_node. That way
> SLUB only operates on nodes with memory. Any allocation attempt on a
> memoryless node will fall whereupon SLUB will fetch memory from a nearby
> node (depending on how memory policies and cpuset describe fallback).
>
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>
>
> Index: linux-2.6.22-rc4-mm2/mm/slub.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.22-rc4-mm2.orig/mm/slub.c 2007-06-18 11:16:15.000000000 -0700
> +++ linux-2.6.22-rc4-mm2/mm/slub.c 2007-06-18 11:28:50.000000000 -0700
<snip>
Christoph:
This patch didn't apply to 22-rc4-mm2. Does it assume some other SLUB
patches?
I resolved the conflicts by just doing what the description says:
replacing all 'for_each_online_node" with "for_each_memory_node", but I
was surprised that this one patch out of 10 didn't apply. I'm probably
missing some other patch.
Lee
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-06-20 14:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-06-18 19:19 [patch 00/10] NUMA: Memoryless Node support V1 clameter
2007-06-18 19:19 ` [patch 01/10] Memoryless nodes: Fix GFP_THISNODE behavior clameter
2007-06-18 19:19 ` [patch 02/10] NUMA: Introduce node_memory_map clameter
2007-06-18 19:19 ` [patch 03/10] Fix MPOL_INTERLEAVE behavior for memoryless nodes clameter
2007-06-18 19:20 ` [patch 04/10] OOM: use the node_memory_map instead of constructing one on the fly clameter
2007-06-18 19:20 ` [patch 05/10] Memoryless Nodes: No need for kswapd clameter
2007-06-18 19:20 ` [patch 06/10] Memoryless Node: Slab support clameter
2007-06-18 19:20 ` [patch 07/10] Memoryless nodes: SLUB support clameter
2007-06-20 14:10 ` Lee Schermerhorn [this message]
2007-06-20 16:53 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-06-20 17:17 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2007-06-18 19:20 ` [patch 08/10] Uncached allocator: Handle memoryless nodes clameter
2007-06-19 6:59 ` Jes Sorensen
2007-06-18 19:20 ` [patch 09/10] Memoryless node: Allow profiling data to fall back to other nodes clameter
2007-06-18 19:20 ` [patch 10/10] Memoryless nodes: Update memory policy and page migration clameter
2007-06-19 18:48 ` [patch 00/10] NUMA: Memoryless Node support V1 Andrew Morton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1182348612.5058.3.camel@localhost \
--to=lee.schermerhorn@hp.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=clameter@sgi.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox