From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Subject: Re: [PATCH] Document Linux Memory Policy From: Lee Schermerhorn In-Reply-To: References: <1180467234.5067.52.camel@localhost> <200705312243.20242.ak@suse.de> <20070601093803.GE10459@minantech.com> <200706011221.33062.ak@suse.de> <1180718106.5278.28.camel@localhost> <1180726713.5278.80.camel@localhost> <1180731944.5278.146.camel@localhost> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2007 09:46:30 -0400 Message-Id: <1180964790.5055.2.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Christoph Lameter Cc: Andi Kleen , Gleb Natapov , linux-mm , Andrew Morton List-ID: On Fri, 2007-06-01 at 14:56 -0700, Christoph Lameter wrote: > On Fri, 1 Jun 2007, Lee Schermerhorn wrote: > > > > > I don't understand what you mean by "memory region based". Christoph: obviously I disagree with you on most of the points as well as your conclusion. I may get preempted out of this exchange for a while, but in any case, I'm going to try to recap all of the points, including the application model, current capabilities, the semantics I'm expousing and why they make sense to me. I fear our mental maps of the territory are such that no reconciliation is possible, but I need to make the attempt because you seem to be in a position to block me here. Later, Lee -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org