From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Subject: Re: [PATCH] Document Linux Memory Policy From: Lee Schermerhorn In-Reply-To: <20070531082016.19080@gmx.net> References: <1180467234.5067.52.camel@localhost> <200705292216.31102.ak@suse.de> <1180541849.5850.30.camel@localhost> <20070531082016.19080@gmx.net> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 10:49:56 -0400 Message-Id: <1180622996.5091.25.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Michael Kerrisk Cc: ak@suse.de, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, clameter@sgi.com List-ID: On Thu, 2007-05-31 at 10:20 +0200, Michael Kerrisk wrote: > > > > The docs are wrong. This is fully supported. > > > > > > Yes, I gave up on that one and the warning in the manpage should be > > > probably dropped > > > > OK. I'll work with the man page maintainers. > > Hi Lee, > > If you could write a patch for the man page, that would be ideal. > Location of current tarball is in the .sig. Michael: I'd be happy to. I'll put that in my queue ;-). Lee -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org