From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
To: Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>
Cc: Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
Thomas Graf <tgraf@suug.ch>, David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Daniel Phillips <phillips@google.com>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] make slab gfp fair
Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 21:18:19 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1179429499.2925.26.camel@lappy> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0705171101360.18085@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com>
On Thu, 2007-05-17 at 11:02 -0700, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Thu, 17 May 2007, Matt Mackall wrote:
>
> > Simply stated, the problem is sometimes it's impossible to free memory
> > without allocating more memory. Thus we must keep enough protected
> > reserve that we can guarantee progress. This is what mempools are for
> > in the regular I/O stack. Unfortunately, mempools are a bad match for
> > network I/O.
> >
> > It's absolutely correct that performance doesn't matter in the case
> > this patch is addressing. All that matters is digging ourselves out of
> > OOM. The box either survives the crisis or it doesn't.
>
> Well we fail allocations in order to do so and these allocations may be
> even nonatomic allocs. Pretty dangerous approach.
These allocations didn't have right to the memory they would otherwise
get. Also they will end up in the page allocator just like they normally
would. So from that point, its no different than what happens now; only
they will not eat away the very last bit of memory that could be used to
avoid deadlocking.
> > It's also correct that we should hardly ever get into a situation
> > where we trigger this problem. But such cases are still fairly easy to
> > trigger in some workloads. Swap over network is an excellent example,
> > because we typically don't start swapping heavily until we're quite
> > low on freeable memory.
>
> Is it not possible to avoid failing allocs? Instead put processes to
> sleep? Run synchrononous reclaim?
That would radically change the way we do reclaim and would be much
harder to get right. Such things could be done independant from this.
The proposed patch doesn't change how the kernel functions at this
point; it just enforces an existing rule better.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-05-17 19:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 69+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-05-14 13:19 Peter Zijlstra
2007-05-14 13:19 ` [PATCH 1/5] mm: page allocation rank Peter Zijlstra
2007-05-14 13:19 ` [PATCH 2/5] mm: slab allocation fairness Peter Zijlstra
2007-05-14 15:51 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-05-14 13:19 ` [PATCH 3/5] mm: slub " Peter Zijlstra
2007-05-14 15:49 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-05-14 16:14 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-05-14 16:35 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-05-14 13:19 ` [PATCH 4/5] mm: slob " Peter Zijlstra
2007-05-14 13:19 ` [PATCH 5/5] mm: allow mempool to fall back to memalloc reserves Peter Zijlstra
2007-05-14 15:53 ` [PATCH 0/5] make slab gfp fair Christoph Lameter
2007-05-14 16:10 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-05-14 16:37 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-05-14 16:12 ` Matt Mackall
2007-05-14 16:29 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-05-14 17:40 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-05-14 17:57 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-05-14 19:28 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-05-14 19:56 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-05-14 20:03 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-05-14 20:06 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-05-14 20:12 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-05-14 20:25 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-05-15 17:27 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-05-15 22:02 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-05-16 6:59 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-05-16 18:43 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-05-16 19:25 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-05-16 19:53 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-05-16 20:18 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-05-16 20:27 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-05-16 20:40 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-05-16 20:44 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-05-16 20:54 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-05-16 20:59 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-05-16 21:04 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-05-16 21:13 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-05-16 21:20 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-05-16 21:42 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-05-17 7:28 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-05-17 17:30 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-05-17 17:53 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-05-17 18:01 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-05-14 19:44 ` Andrew Morton
2007-05-14 20:01 ` Matt Mackall
2007-05-14 20:05 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-05-17 3:02 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-05-17 7:08 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-05-17 17:29 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-05-17 17:52 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-05-17 17:59 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-05-17 17:53 ` Matt Mackall
2007-05-17 18:02 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-05-17 19:18 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2007-05-17 19:24 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-05-17 21:26 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-05-17 21:44 ` Paul Jackson
2007-05-17 22:27 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-05-18 9:54 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-05-18 17:11 ` Paul Jackson
2007-05-18 17:11 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-05-20 8:39 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-05-21 16:45 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-05-21 19:33 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-05-21 19:43 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-05-21 20:08 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-05-21 20:32 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-05-21 20:54 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-05-21 21:04 ` Christoph Lameter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1179429499.2925.26.camel@lappy \
--to=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=clameter@sgi.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mpm@selenic.com \
--cc=penberg@cs.helsinki.fi \
--cc=phillips@google.com \
--cc=tgraf@suug.ch \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox