From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
To: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@tv-sign.ru>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] convert mmap_sem to a scalable rw_mutex
Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 14:38:01 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1179146281.6810.65.camel@twins> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070514115830.GD31234@wotan.suse.de>
On Mon, 2007-05-14 at 13:58 +0200, Nick Piggin wrote:
> On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 05:56:21PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >
> > * Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> wrote:
> >
> > > I was toying with a scalable rw_mutex and found that it gives ~10%
> > > reduction in system time on ebizzy runs (without the MADV_FREE patch).
> > >
> > > 2-way x86_64 pentium D box:
> > >
> > > 2.6.21
> > >
> > > /usr/bin/time ./ebizzy -m -P
> > > 59.49user 137.74system 1:49.22elapsed 180%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k
> > > 0inputs+0outputs (0major+33555877minor)pagefaults 0swaps
> > >
> > > 2.6.21-rw_mutex
> > >
> > > /usr/bin/time ./ebizzy -m -P
> > > 57.85user 124.30system 1:42.99elapsed 176%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k
> > > 0inputs+0outputs (0major+33555877minor)pagefaults 0swaps
> >
> > nice! This 6% runtime reduction on a 2-way box will i suspect get
> > exponentially better on systems with more CPUs/cores.
>
> Is this with the MADV_DONTNEED kernel and glibc work?
No, just the old stuff.
>
> > i also like the design, alot: instead of doing a full new lock type
> > (with per-arch changes, extra lockdep support, etc. etc) you layered the
> > new abstraction ontop of mutexes. This makes this hard locking
> > abstraction look really, really simple, while the percpu_counter trick
> > makes it scale _perfectly_ for the reader case. Congratulations!
> >
> > given how nice this looks already, have you considered completely
> > replacing rwsems with this? I suspect you could test the correctness of
>
> Not to take anything away from this lock type (because it can have its
> uses), but have you considered the size of this lock and its write side
> performance?
Yeah, I did, I was initially just toying about with the concept, to see
if it was doable at all. I only posted because I got these fairly good
numbers.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-05-14 12:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-05-11 13:15 Peter Zijlstra
2007-05-11 13:15 ` [PATCH 1/2] " Peter Zijlstra
2007-05-11 14:03 ` Christoph Hellwig
2007-05-11 16:31 ` Andrew Morton
2007-05-11 17:07 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-05-11 18:05 ` Andrew Morton
2007-05-12 18:55 ` Andi Kleen
2007-05-12 18:06 ` Andrew Morton
2007-05-12 18:11 ` Andrew Morton
2007-05-16 23:28 ` Andrew Morton
2007-05-16 23:40 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-05-17 0:24 ` Andrew Morton
2007-05-12 18:12 ` Oleg Nesterov
2007-05-12 19:21 ` Andi Kleen
2007-05-12 21:42 ` Oleg Nesterov
2007-05-11 17:57 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-05-11 23:00 ` Oleg Nesterov
2007-05-12 7:39 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-05-12 13:41 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-05-12 16:04 ` Oleg Nesterov
2007-05-12 16:57 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-05-12 18:03 ` Oleg Nesterov
2007-05-14 10:59 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-05-14 11:36 ` Nick Piggin
2007-05-15 0:36 ` Paul E. McKenney
2007-05-15 7:43 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-05-15 15:29 ` Paul E. McKenney
2007-05-15 16:17 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-05-15 18:52 ` Paul E. McKenney
2007-05-11 13:15 ` [PATCH 2/2] mm: change mmap_sem over to the " Peter Zijlstra
2007-05-11 16:17 ` Andrew Morton
2007-05-11 17:12 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-05-11 18:08 ` Andrew Morton
2007-05-14 11:54 ` Nick Piggin
2007-05-11 15:56 ` [PATCH 0/2] convert mmap_sem to a " Ingo Molnar
2007-05-11 16:52 ` Eric Dumazet
2007-05-11 17:18 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-05-14 12:07 ` Nick Piggin
2007-05-14 12:57 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-05-11 17:08 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-05-14 11:58 ` Nick Piggin
2007-05-14 12:38 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2007-05-12 9:27 ` Esben Nielsen
2007-05-12 10:01 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-05-12 13:44 ` Esben Nielsen
2007-05-12 14:33 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-05-12 15:34 ` Esben Nielsen
2007-05-12 15:42 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-05-12 15:26 ` Eric Dumazet
2007-05-14 8:50 ` Esben Nielsen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1179146281.6810.65.camel@twins \
--to=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=npiggin@suse.de \
--cc=oleg@tv-sign.ru \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox