linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
To: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@tv-sign.ru>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] convert mmap_sem to a scalable rw_mutex
Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 14:38:01 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1179146281.6810.65.camel@twins> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070514115830.GD31234@wotan.suse.de>

On Mon, 2007-05-14 at 13:58 +0200, Nick Piggin wrote:
> On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 05:56:21PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > 
> > * Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> wrote:
> > 
> > > I was toying with a scalable rw_mutex and found that it gives ~10% 
> > > reduction in system time on ebizzy runs (without the MADV_FREE patch).
> > > 
> > > 2-way x86_64 pentium D box:
> > > 
> > > 2.6.21
> > > 
> > > /usr/bin/time ./ebizzy -m -P
> > > 59.49user 137.74system 1:49.22elapsed 180%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k
> > > 0inputs+0outputs (0major+33555877minor)pagefaults 0swaps
> > > 
> > > 2.6.21-rw_mutex
> > > 
> > > /usr/bin/time ./ebizzy -m -P
> > > 57.85user 124.30system 1:42.99elapsed 176%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k
> > > 0inputs+0outputs (0major+33555877minor)pagefaults 0swaps
> > 
> > nice! This 6% runtime reduction on a 2-way box will i suspect get 
> > exponentially better on systems with more CPUs/cores.
> 
> Is this with the MADV_DONTNEED kernel and glibc work?

No, just the old stuff.

> 
> > i also like the design, alot: instead of doing a full new lock type 
> > (with per-arch changes, extra lockdep support, etc. etc) you layered the 
> > new abstraction ontop of mutexes. This makes this hard locking 
> > abstraction look really, really simple, while the percpu_counter trick 
> > makes it scale _perfectly_ for the reader case. Congratulations!
> > 
> > given how nice this looks already, have you considered completely 
> > replacing rwsems with this? I suspect you could test the correctness of 
> 
> Not to take anything away from this lock type (because it can have its
> uses), but have you considered the size of this lock and its write side
> performance? 

Yeah, I did, I was initially just toying about with the concept, to see
if it was doable at all. I only posted because I got these fairly good
numbers.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2007-05-14 12:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-05-11 13:15 Peter Zijlstra
2007-05-11 13:15 ` [PATCH 1/2] " Peter Zijlstra
2007-05-11 14:03   ` Christoph Hellwig
2007-05-11 16:31   ` Andrew Morton
2007-05-11 17:07     ` Christoph Lameter
2007-05-11 18:05       ` Andrew Morton
2007-05-12 18:55         ` Andi Kleen
2007-05-12 18:06           ` Andrew Morton
2007-05-12 18:11             ` Andrew Morton
2007-05-16 23:28             ` Andrew Morton
2007-05-16 23:40               ` Christoph Lameter
2007-05-17  0:24                 ` Andrew Morton
2007-05-12 18:12           ` Oleg Nesterov
2007-05-12 19:21             ` Andi Kleen
2007-05-12 21:42               ` Oleg Nesterov
2007-05-11 17:57     ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-05-11 23:00   ` Oleg Nesterov
2007-05-12  7:39     ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-05-12 13:41     ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-05-12 16:04       ` Oleg Nesterov
2007-05-12 16:57         ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-05-12 18:03           ` Oleg Nesterov
2007-05-14 10:59             ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-05-14 11:36               ` Nick Piggin
2007-05-15  0:36               ` Paul E. McKenney
2007-05-15  7:43                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-05-15 15:29                   ` Paul E. McKenney
2007-05-15 16:17                     ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-05-15 18:52                       ` Paul E. McKenney
2007-05-11 13:15 ` [PATCH 2/2] mm: change mmap_sem over to the " Peter Zijlstra
2007-05-11 16:17   ` Andrew Morton
2007-05-11 17:12     ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-05-11 18:08       ` Andrew Morton
2007-05-14 11:54         ` Nick Piggin
2007-05-11 15:56 ` [PATCH 0/2] convert mmap_sem to a " Ingo Molnar
2007-05-11 16:52   ` Eric Dumazet
2007-05-11 17:18     ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-05-14 12:07       ` Nick Piggin
2007-05-14 12:57         ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-05-11 17:08   ` Christoph Lameter
2007-05-14 11:58   ` Nick Piggin
2007-05-14 12:38     ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2007-05-12  9:27 ` Esben Nielsen
2007-05-12 10:01   ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-05-12 13:44     ` Esben Nielsen
2007-05-12 14:33       ` Ingo Molnar
2007-05-12 15:34         ` Esben Nielsen
2007-05-12 15:42           ` Ingo Molnar
2007-05-12 15:26       ` Eric Dumazet
2007-05-14  8:50         ` Esben Nielsen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1179146281.6810.65.camel@twins \
    --to=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=npiggin@suse.de \
    --cc=oleg@tv-sign.ru \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox