From: Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@hp.com>
To: Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, clameter@SGI.com, ak@suse.de,
nish.aravamudan@gmail.com, mel@csn.ul.ie, apw@shadowen.org,
Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Eric Whitney <eric.whitney@hp.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix hugetlb pool allocation with empty nodes - V2
Date: Fri, 04 May 2007 16:29:02 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1178310543.5236.43.camel@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070503022107.GA13592@kryten>
On Wed, 2007-05-02 at 21:21 -0500, Anton Blanchard wrote:
> An interesting bug was pointed out to me where we failed to allocate
> hugepages evenly. In the example below node 7 has no memory (it only has
> CPUs). Node 0 and 1 have plenty of free memory. After doing:
Here's my attempt to fix the problem [I see it on HP platforms as well],
without removing the population check in build_zonelists_node(). Seems
to work.
[Because I had to rebase the patch to 21-rc7-mm2 where I'm working, I
just refreshed the entire patch, instead of creating an incremental
patch on top of Anton's.]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
[PATCH] Fix hugetlb pool allocation with empty nodes V2
Against 2.6.21-rc7-mm2
Changes V1 [Anton] -> V2 [Lee]:
1) reverted the populated_zone() check in build_zonelists_node to avoid
empty zones in the allocation zonelists.
2) added a populated_zone() check to alloc_fresh_huge_page(). Skip
nodes whose zone corresponding to GFP_HIGHUSER is empty.
--------
Original description:
An interesting bug was pointed out to me where we failed to allocate
hugepages evenly. In the example below node 7 has no memory (it only has
CPUs). Node 0 and 1 have plenty of free memory. After doing:
# echo 16 > /proc/sys/vm/nr_hugepages
We see the imbalance:
# cat /sys/devices/system/node/node*/meminfo|grep HugePages_Total
Node 0 HugePages_Total: 6
Node 1 HugePages_Total: 10
Node 7 HugePages_Total: 0
It didnt take long to realise that alloc_fresh_huge_page is allocating
from node 7 without GFP_THISNODE set, so we fallback to its next
preferred node (ie 1). This means we end up with a 1/3 2/3 imbalance.
After fixing this it still didnt work, and after some more poking I see
why. When building our fallback zonelist in build_zonelists_node we
skip empty zones. This means zone 7 never registers node 7's empty
zonelists and instead registers node 1's. Therefore when we ask for a
page from node 7, using the GFP_THISNODE flag we end up with node 1
memory.
<snip bit about removing pop check from build_zonelists_node...>
Add zone population check to alloc_fresh_huge_page() and skip nodes
with unpopulated zone.
V2 testing:
Tested on 4-node, 32GB HP NUMA platform with funky 512MB pseudo-zone
for hardware interleaved memory. The pseudo-zone contains only ZONE_DMA
memory. Without this patch, after "echo 64 >/proc/sys/vm/nr_hugepages",
"cat /sys/devices/system/node/node*/meminfo | grep HugeP" would yield:
Node 0 HugePages_Total: 25
Node 0 HugePages_Free: 25
Node 1 HugePages_Total: 13
Node 1 HugePages_Free: 13
Node 2 HugePages_Total: 13
Node 2 HugePages_Free: 13
Node 3 HugePages_Total: 13
Node 3 HugePages_Free: 13
Node 4 HugePages_Total: 0
Node 4 HugePages_Free: 0
With patch:
Node 0 HugePages_Total: 16
Node 0 HugePages_Free: 16
Node 1 HugePages_Total: 16
Node 1 HugePages_Free: 16
Node 2 HugePages_Total: 16
Node 2 HugePages_Free: 16
Node 3 HugePages_Total: 16
Node 3 HugePages_Free: 16
Node 4 HugePages_Total: 0
Node 4 HugePages_Free: 0
Originally
Signed-off-by: Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Lee Schermerhorn <lee.schermerhorn@hp.com>
mm/hugetlb.c | 23 ++++++++++++++++++-----
1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
Index: Linux/mm/hugetlb.c
===================================================================
--- Linux.orig/mm/hugetlb.c 2007-05-04 15:41:10.000000000 -0400
+++ Linux/mm/hugetlb.c 2007-05-04 15:48:22.000000000 -0400
@@ -107,11 +107,24 @@ static int alloc_fresh_huge_page(void)
{
static int nid = 0;
struct page *page;
- page = alloc_pages_node(nid, htlb_alloc_mask|__GFP_COMP|__GFP_NOWARN,
- HUGETLB_PAGE_ORDER);
- nid = next_node(nid, node_online_map);
- if (nid == MAX_NUMNODES)
- nid = first_node(node_online_map);
+ int start_nid = nid;
+
+ do {
+ pg_data_t *pgdat = NODE_DATA(nid);
+ struct zone *zone = pgdat->node_zones + gfp_zone(GFP_HIGHUSER);
+
+ /*
+ * accept only nodes with populated "HIGHUSER" zone
+ */
+ if (populated_zone(zone))
+ page = alloc_pages_node(nid,
+ GFP_HIGHUSER|__GFP_COMP|GFP_THISNODE,
+ HUGETLB_PAGE_ORDER);
+
+ nid = next_node(nid, node_online_map);
+ if (nid == MAX_NUMNODES)
+ nid = first_node(node_online_map);
+ } while (!page && nid != start_nid);
if (page) {
set_compound_page_dtor(page, free_huge_page);
spin_lock(&hugetlb_lock);
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-05-04 20:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-05-03 2:21 [PATCH] Fix hugetlb pool allocation with empty nodes Anton Blanchard
2007-05-03 3:02 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-05-03 6:07 ` Anton Blanchard
2007-05-03 6:37 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-05-03 8:59 ` Andi Kleen
2007-05-03 13:22 ` Anton Blanchard
2007-05-04 20:29 ` Lee Schermerhorn [this message]
2007-05-04 21:27 ` [PATCH] Fix hugetlb pool allocation with empty nodes - V2 Christoph Lameter
2007-05-04 22:39 ` Nish Aravamudan
2007-05-07 13:40 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2007-05-09 16:37 ` [PATCH] Fix hugetlb pool allocation with empty nodes - V2 -> V3 Lee Schermerhorn
2007-05-09 16:57 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-05-09 19:17 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2007-05-16 17:27 ` Nish Aravamudan
2007-05-16 20:01 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2007-05-09 19:59 ` Nish Aravamudan
2007-05-09 20:37 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2007-05-09 20:54 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-05-09 22:34 ` Nish Aravamudan
2007-05-15 16:30 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2007-05-16 23:47 ` Nish Aravamudan
2007-05-16 19:59 ` Nish Aravamudan
2007-05-16 20:32 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2007-05-16 22:17 ` [PATCH/RFC] Fix hugetlb pool allocation with empty nodes - V4 Lee Schermerhorn
2007-05-18 0:30 ` Nish Aravamudan
2007-05-21 14:57 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2007-05-21 17:51 ` Nish Aravamudan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1178310543.5236.43.camel@localhost \
--to=lee.schermerhorn@hp.com \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=anton@samba.org \
--cc=apw@shadowen.org \
--cc=clameter@SGI.com \
--cc=eric.whitney@hp.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mel@csn.ul.ie \
--cc=nish.aravamudan@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox