From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/12] mm: count unstable pages per BDI From: Peter Zijlstra In-Reply-To: References: <20070417071046.318415445@chello.nl> <20070417071703.710381113@chello.nl> <1177006362.2934.13.camel@lappy> <1177008406.2934.19.camel@lappy> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 21:23:32 +0200 Message-Id: <1177010612.7066.20.camel@twins> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Miklos Szeredi Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, neilb@suse.de, dgc@sgi.com, tomoki.sekiyama.qu@hitachi.com, nikita@clusterfs.com, trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no, yingchao.zhou@gmail.com List-ID: On Thu, 2007-04-19 at 21:20 +0200, Miklos Szeredi wrote: > > Index: linux-2.6/fs/buffer.c > > =================================================================== > > --- linux-2.6.orig/fs/buffer.c 2007-04-19 19:59:26.000000000 +0200 > > +++ linux-2.6/fs/buffer.c 2007-04-19 20:35:39.000000000 +0200 > > @@ -733,7 +733,7 @@ int __set_page_dirty_buffers(struct page > > if (page->mapping) { /* Race with truncate? */ > > if (mapping_cap_account_dirty(mapping)) { > > __inc_zone_page_state(page, NR_FILE_DIRTY); > > - __inc_bdi_stat(mapping->backing_dev_info, BDI_DIRTY); > > + __inc_bdi_stat(mapping->backing_dev_info, BDI_RECLAIM); > > This name suggests it's _under_ reclaim, which is not true. You might > rather want to call it BDI_RECLAIMABLE, or something similar in > meaning. Yeah, my fingers got lazy on me :-) will instruct them to type more. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org