From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/12] mm: count unstable pages per BDI From: Peter Zijlstra In-Reply-To: <1177008406.2934.19.camel@lappy> References: <20070417071046.318415445@chello.nl> <20070417071703.710381113@chello.nl> <1177006362.2934.13.camel@lappy> <1177008406.2934.19.camel@lappy> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 21:00:36 +0200 Message-Id: <1177009236.7066.19.camel@twins> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Miklos Szeredi Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, neilb@suse.de, dgc@sgi.com, tomoki.sekiyama.qu@hitachi.com, nikita@clusterfs.com, trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no, yingchao.zhou@gmail.com List-ID: On Thu, 2007-04-19 at 20:46 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Thu, 2007-04-19 at 20:12 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > On Thu, 2007-04-19 at 19:44 +0200, Miklos Szeredi wrote: > > > > Count per BDI unstable pages. > > > > > > > > > > I'm wondering, is it really worth having this category separate from > > > per BDI brity pages? > > > > > > With the exception of the export to sysfs, always the sum of unstable > > > + dirty is used. > > > > I guess you are right, but it offends my sense of aesthetics to break > > symmetry with the zone statistics. However, it has the added advantage > > of only needing 2 deltas as well. > > I guess, this should do. OK, the compiler told me I messed up :-/. I'll respin the whole series and repost tomorrow or something... -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org