From: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no>
To: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, staubach@redhat.com, hugh@veritas.com,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] update ctime and mtime for mmaped write
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2007 13:36:44 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1172083004.9108.6.camel@heimdal.trondhjem.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E1HJwCl-0003V6-00@dorka.pomaz.szeredi.hu>
On Wed, 2007-02-21 at 19:28 +0100, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> > > This flag is checked in msync() and __fput(), and if set, the file
> > > times are updated and the flag is cleared
> >
> > Why not also check inside vfs_getattr?
>
> This is the minimum, that the standard asks for.
>
> Note, your porposal would touch the times in vfs_getattr(), which
> means, that the modification times would depend on the time of the
> last stat() call, which is not really right, though it would still be
> conforming.
>
> It is much saner, if the modification time is always the time of the
> last write() or msync().
I disagree. The above doesn't allow a program like 'make' to discover
whether or not the file has changed by simply calling stat(). Instead,
you're forcing a call to msync()+stat().
Cheers
Trond
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-02-21 18:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-02-21 17:51 Miklos Szeredi, Miklos Szeredi
2007-02-21 18:07 ` Peter Staubach
2007-02-21 18:23 ` Miklos Szeredi
2007-02-21 18:54 ` Peter Staubach
2007-02-21 19:07 ` Miklos Szeredi
2007-02-22 17:36 ` Peter Staubach
2007-02-22 18:16 ` Miklos Szeredi
2007-02-22 20:11 ` Peter Staubach
2007-02-22 20:43 ` Miklos Szeredi
2007-02-22 20:50 ` Peter Staubach
2007-02-21 18:12 ` Trond Myklebust
2007-02-21 18:28 ` Miklos Szeredi
2007-02-21 18:36 ` Trond Myklebust [this message]
2007-02-21 18:50 ` Peter Staubach
2007-02-21 18:50 ` Miklos Szeredi
2007-02-22 4:26 ` Andrew Morton
2007-02-22 7:49 ` Miklos Szeredi
2007-02-22 17:39 ` Peter Staubach
2007-02-22 18:08 ` Miklos Szeredi
2007-02-22 20:14 ` Peter Staubach
2007-02-22 20:48 ` Miklos Szeredi
2007-02-22 20:55 ` Peter Staubach
2007-02-22 21:04 ` Trond Myklebust
2007-02-22 21:28 ` Miklos Szeredi
2007-02-22 21:52 ` Peter Staubach
2007-02-22 22:08 ` Miklos Szeredi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1172083004.9108.6.camel@heimdal.trondhjem.org \
--to=trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hugh@veritas.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=miklos@szeredi.hu \
--cc=staubach@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox