linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no>
To: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, staubach@redhat.com, hugh@veritas.com,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] update ctime and mtime for mmaped write
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2007 13:36:44 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1172083004.9108.6.camel@heimdal.trondhjem.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E1HJwCl-0003V6-00@dorka.pomaz.szeredi.hu>

On Wed, 2007-02-21 at 19:28 +0100, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> > > This flag is checked in msync() and __fput(), and if set, the file
> > > times are updated and the flag is cleared
> > 
> > Why not also check inside vfs_getattr?
> 
> This is the minimum, that the standard asks for.
> 
> Note, your porposal would touch the times in vfs_getattr(), which
> means, that the modification times would depend on the time of the
> last stat() call, which is not really right, though it would still be
> conforming.
> 
> It is much saner, if the modification time is always the time of the
> last write() or msync().

I disagree. The above doesn't allow a program like 'make' to discover
whether or not the file has changed by simply calling stat(). Instead,
you're forcing a call to msync()+stat().

Cheers
  Trond

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2007-02-21 18:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-02-21 17:51 Miklos Szeredi, Miklos Szeredi
2007-02-21 18:07 ` Peter Staubach
2007-02-21 18:23   ` Miklos Szeredi
2007-02-21 18:54     ` Peter Staubach
2007-02-21 19:07       ` Miklos Szeredi
2007-02-22 17:36         ` Peter Staubach
2007-02-22 18:16           ` Miklos Szeredi
2007-02-22 20:11             ` Peter Staubach
2007-02-22 20:43               ` Miklos Szeredi
2007-02-22 20:50                 ` Peter Staubach
2007-02-21 18:12 ` Trond Myklebust
2007-02-21 18:28   ` Miklos Szeredi
2007-02-21 18:36     ` Trond Myklebust [this message]
2007-02-21 18:50       ` Peter Staubach
2007-02-21 18:50       ` Miklos Szeredi
2007-02-22  4:26 ` Andrew Morton
2007-02-22  7:49   ` Miklos Szeredi
2007-02-22 17:39     ` Peter Staubach
2007-02-22 18:08       ` Miklos Szeredi
2007-02-22 20:14         ` Peter Staubach
2007-02-22 20:48           ` Miklos Szeredi
2007-02-22 20:55             ` Peter Staubach
2007-02-22 21:04             ` Trond Myklebust
2007-02-22 21:28               ` Miklos Szeredi
2007-02-22 21:52                 ` Peter Staubach
2007-02-22 22:08                   ` Miklos Szeredi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1172083004.9108.6.camel@heimdal.trondhjem.org \
    --to=trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=hugh@veritas.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=miklos@szeredi.hu \
    --cc=staubach@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox