From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/9] VM deadlock avoidance -v10 From: Peter Zijlstra In-Reply-To: <20070117091206.GA9845@elf.ucw.cz> References: <20070116094557.494892000@taijtu.programming.kicks-ass.net> <20070117091206.GA9845@elf.ucw.cz> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 10:20:38 +0100 Message-Id: <1169025638.22935.114.camel@twins> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Pavel Machek Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, David Miller List-ID: On Wed, 2007-01-17 at 10:12 +0100, Pavel Machek wrote: > Hi! > > > These patches implement the basic infrastructure to allow swap over networked > > storage. > > > > The basic idea is to reserve some memory up front to use when regular memory > > runs out. > > > > To bound network behaviour we accept only a limited number of concurrent > > packets and drop those packets that are not aimed at the connection(s) servicing > > the VM. Also all network paths that interact with userspace are to be avoided - > > e.g. taps and NF_QUEUE. > > > > PF_MEMALLOC is set when processing emergency skbs. This makes sense in that we > > are indeed working on behalf of the swapper/VM. This allows us to use the > > regular memory allocators for processing but requires that said processing have > > bounded memory usage and has that accounted in the reserve. > > How does it work with ARP, for example? You still need to reply to ARP > if you want to keep your ethernet connections. ETH_P_ARP is fully processed (under PF_MEMALLOC). ETH_P_IP{,V6} starts to drop packets not for selected sockets (SOCK_VMIO) and processes the rest (under PF_MEMALLOC) with limitations; the packet may never depend on user-space to complete processing. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org