From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Subject: Re: Alternative msync() fix for 2.6.18? From: Jeff Licquia In-Reply-To: <1167834727.3798.6.camel@xenpc.internal.licquia.org> References: <20061226123106.GA32708@deprecation.cyrius.com> <20061226132547.GC6256@deprecation.cyrius.com> <20061229140107.GG2062@deprecation.cyrius.com> <1167834727.3798.6.camel@xenpc.internal.licquia.org> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Thu, 04 Jan 2007 08:35:56 -0500 Message-Id: <1167917756.6606.0.camel@xenpc.internal.licquia.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Martin Michlmayr Cc: Hugh Dickins , Peter Zijlstra , 394392@bugs.debian.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: On Wed, 2007-01-03 at 09:32 -0500, Jeff Licquia wrote: > I am running the complete lsb-runtime-test suite against the new kernels > (as installed yesterday from the sid apt repo at > http://kernel-archive.buildserver.net/debian-kernel), but I also did a > run with just the msync test, which passed. I will report the results > for the full suite when they become available. Those results are in. No additional failures are caused by the new kernels. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org