From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Subject: Re: Alternative msync() fix for 2.6.18? From: Jeff Licquia In-Reply-To: <20061229140107.GG2062@deprecation.cyrius.com> References: <20061226123106.GA32708@deprecation.cyrius.com> <20061226132547.GC6256@deprecation.cyrius.com> <20061229140107.GG2062@deprecation.cyrius.com> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Wed, 03 Jan 2007 09:32:07 -0500 Message-Id: <1167834727.3798.6.camel@xenpc.internal.licquia.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Martin Michlmayr Cc: Hugh Dickins , Peter Zijlstra , 394392@bugs.debian.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: On Fri, 2006-12-29 at 15:01 +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > Yes, I agree. I'm CCing the linux-mm list in hope that someone can > review your patch. In the meantime, I've asked the Debian LSB folks to > verify that your patch fixes the LSB problem. I am running the complete lsb-runtime-test suite against the new kernels (as installed yesterday from the sid apt repo at http://kernel-archive.buildserver.net/debian-kernel), but I also did a run with just the msync test, which passed. I will report the results for the full suite when they become available. FWIW, here's uname: Linux xenpc 2.6.18-4-xen-686 #1 SMP Mon Jan 1 02:33:53 UTC 2007 i686 GNU/Linux -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org