linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
To: Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/16] concurrent pagecache (against 2.6.19-rt)
Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 20:24:16 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1165865056.32332.60.camel@twins> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0612111100300.2253@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com>

On Mon, 2006-12-11 at 11:03 -0800, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Thu, 7 Dec 2006, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> 
> > Based on Nick's lockless (read-side) pagecache patches (included in the series)
> > here an attempt to make the write side concurrent.
> 
> On first glance it looks quite interesting and very innovative. Removing 
> the tree_lock completely also reduces cache line usage. The page struct 
> cacheline is already references in most contexts.

Thanks, I'm just curious how bouncy the fine grained radix tree locks
will be. 

> > Comment away ;-)
> 
> Could you post Nick's patches from your email addres and add a From Nick 
> line in them? Its a bit confusing to have a patchset with different 
> originating email addresses. Or does this come about by the evil header 
> mangling of the list processor? Maybe you need to use >From ??

Nah that was on purpose, you can grab the patches from here:

http://programming.kicks-ass.net/kernel-patches/concurrent-pagecache-rt/

if you care, or I can post them again.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

      reply	other threads:[~2006-12-11 19:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-12-07 16:18 Peter Zijlstra
2006-12-07 16:18 ` [PATCH 01/16] radix-tree: RCU lockless readside Nick Piggin
2006-12-07 16:18 ` [PATCH 02/16] radix-tree: use indirect bit Nick Piggin
2006-12-07 16:18 ` [PATCH 03/16] radix-tree: gang_lookup_slot Nick Piggin
2006-12-07 16:18 ` [PATCH 04/16] radix-tree: gang_lookup_tag_slot Peter Zijlstra
2006-12-07 16:18 ` [PATCH 05/16] mm: speculative get page Nick Piggin
2006-12-07 16:18 ` [PATCH 06/16] mm: lockless pagecache lookups Nick Piggin
2006-12-07 16:18 ` [PATCH 07/16] mm: fix speculative page get preemption bug Peter Zijlstra
2006-12-07 16:18 ` [PATCH 08/16] mm: speculative page get for PREEMPT_RT Peter Zijlstra
2006-12-07 16:18 ` [PATCH 09/16] mm: speculative find_get_pages_tag Peter Zijlstra
2006-12-07 16:18 ` [PATCH 10/16] mm: remove find_tylock_page Peter Zijlstra
2006-12-07 16:18 ` [PATCH 11/16] mm: change tree_lock into a spinlock Peter Zijlstra
2006-12-07 16:18 ` [PATCH 12/16] radix-tree: concurrent write side support Peter Zijlstra
2006-12-07 16:18 ` [PATCH 13/16] atomic_ulong_t Peter Zijlstra
2006-12-07 16:18 ` [PATCH 14/16] mm/fs: abstract address_space::nrpages Peter Zijlstra
2006-12-07 16:18 ` [PATCH 15/16] mm: lock_page_ref Peter Zijlstra
2006-12-07 16:18 ` [PATCH 16/16] mm: concurrent pagecache write side Peter Zijlstra
2006-12-11 19:03 ` [PATCH 00/16] concurrent pagecache (against 2.6.19-rt) Christoph Lameter
2006-12-11 19:24   ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1165865056.32332.60.camel@twins \
    --to=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=clameter@sgi.com \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox