From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Subject: Re: faults and signals From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt In-Reply-To: <1160445510.32237.50.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <20061009140354.13840.71273.sendpatchset@linux.site> <20061009140447.13840.20975.sendpatchset@linux.site> <1160427785.7752.19.camel@localhost.localdomain> <452AEC8B.2070008@yahoo.com.au> <1160442685.32237.27.camel@localhost.localdomain> <452AF546.4000901@yahoo.com.au> <1160445510.32237.50.camel@localhost.localdomain> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2006 12:00:01 +1000 Message-Id: <1160445601.32237.53.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Nick Piggin Cc: Nick Piggin , Hugh Dickins , Linux Memory Management , Andrew Morton , Jes Sorensen , Linux Kernel , Ingo Molnar List-ID: > Yes. Tho it's also fairly easy to just add an argument to the wrapper > and fix all archs... but yeah, I will play around. Actually, user_mode(ptregs) is standard, we could add a ptregs arg to the wrapper... or just get rid of it and fix archs, it's not like it was that hard. There aren't that many callers :) Is there any reason why we actually need that wrapper ? Ben. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org